Pac12 has 7-8 legit BCS teams, big10 has 3, SEC 4-5...

That was a great point backed up with a plethora of evidence. Hard not to agree with you.
 
The only team is the PAC that won't finnish in the Top 10 is WSU and they might make it. (Don't let the math get in the way of a sound case.)

And the Dawgs have the inside track on the National Championship game. Bring on the pussies from Tuscaloosa!

 
Last edited:
The Pac 12 has 2 BCS teams, with the possibility a team from the South upset Oregon or Stanford in the title game, making them a BCS team. None of the teams in the Pac 12 South are looking like legit BCS, 10+ win type teams.

I would love to hear who the 8 you think are. I'm guessing every team but WSU, Colorado, Utah, and Cal. Only you would think the Arizona schools, Oregon St, and UW are anywhere near being a BCS team.

I enjoy watching you be an idiot, but you are pressing very badly. I doubt even the Pac 12 coaches would agree with you about the Pac 12 > SEC.
 
I hate the $EC as much as puppy corn syrup but c'mon. The PAC has two or maybe three. In reality the SEC has about the same but the espn-cbs cartel once again convincex everyone there are 6-9.
 
South Carolina, A&M, Bama, LSU, and Florida win the Pac-12 rather easily.
 
UGA wouldnt though. WAY too much hype this season in my opinion
 
[/proceeds to watch UGA win 2013 National Title}
Click to expand...

Don't worry about them making you look bad with Mark Richt as the head coach. I agree with your SEC picks.
 
I like to blow the PAC 12 and say the SEC sucks when Oregon gets beat by Auburn and LSU and my Dawgs get clown fucked by LSU.
 
AP Preseason: 3) Oregon; 4) Stanford; 21) UCLA; 24) USC; 25) Oregon State. Preseason polls are highly political with regional biases favoring the hotbeads of collegiate football in the SEC, Big-12; ACC; and Big Ten. No Pac-12 schools ranked in the second ten and the bottom three of UCLA, USC, and Oregon State can be discounted as simply a very meager west coast bias.

The Pac-12 is more of a two-team conference than ever,...... which is what should be expected in any football association dominated by the likes of Oregon and Stanford. How many times does it have to be said that the Pac-12 (-10 or -8) can never be strong nationally until USC, UCLA, and UW are back on top of west coast collegiate football? That's just the nature of things.
 
AP Preseason: 3) Oregon; 4) Stanford; 21) UCLA; 24) USC; 25) Oregon State. Preseason polls are highly political with regional biases favoring the hotbeads of collegiate football in the SEC, Big-12; ACC; and Big Ten. No Pac-12 schools ranked in the second ten and the bottom three of UCLA, USC, and Oregon State can be discounted as simply a very meager west coast bias.

The Pac-12 is more of a two-team conference than ever,...... which is what should be expected in any football association dominated by the likes of Oregon and Stanford. How many times does it have to be said that the Pac-12 (-10 or -8) can never be strong nationally until USC, UCLA, and UW are back on top of west coast collegiate football? That's just the nature of things.
Click to expand...

or USC, UCLA and Oregon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top