Over/Under on War Crime Pete being "Epsteined"
- Thread starter HuskyBuck
- Start date
Thank you
Faggot
Just dropped in to see how the retard Brigade was fairing.
#narcolivesmatter
Surely the winning 2026 platform.
How's the shutdown going?
#narcolivesmatter
Surely the winning 2026 platform.
How's the shutdown going?
Video backs up admiral’s claim. Another disgusting moment for the modern Dem party and their lapdogs at WaPo.
I think reading comprehension is your weak suit son.. jmho.
I have questions.. albeit the report does say what YOU want to hear, but after closer examination there is some curious language and blaring omissions in the report
Some things may be just left out because they are assumed to be obvious for the everyday reader but after a deeper dive I could notI find any conclusive evidence to point one way or the other. (Honest mistake for any readers who were misled and didn't attempt to verify everything in the reports
Let's see how smart you actually are, and if you fully understand what I'm referring to and what the issues might be.
I know, I know.…you have deemed me irrelevant, this is your chance to prove it.
Last edited:
Feel free to debunk this. It rings
true because the war on drugs was in full swing and both parties were trying to out do each other
true because the war on drugs was in full swing and both parties were trying to out do each other
Because of course there is a reason the Dems are protecting drug cartels.
Last edited:
UiagaleleiUgly
Member
That's an easy debunk. Nowhere is the military authorized to fire on drug smuggling boats. Ask your pal, Grok.
Last edited:
No Grok needed…https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/senate-bill/2878
UiagaleleiUgly
Member
Thank you, but that's too much for Race. Twitter is his source for all news and information. Gotta keep it simple.
The point: Nowhere in this 1986 act is the military authorized to fire on drug boats, as was stated by Race's MAGA influencer, Angry Frog.
Last edited:
Reading comprehension is hard. @HuskyBuck true?
Last edited:
UiagaleleiUgly
Member
Speak plainly.
UiagaleleiUgly
Member
Please be pointing to the verbiage that authorizes the military to skip all standard law enforcement procedure/rules of engagement and blast civilian boats out of international waters.That is the point that's trying to be made by Angry Frog, no? That's what's happening, yes?
Last edited: