DoogieMcDoogerson
Active poster
I like this guy. Why won't SC hire him.
If USC would have had a good coach to start the year they could be playing for a National Title, they are pretty loaded.
If USC would have had a good coach to start the year they could be playing for a National Title, they are pretty loaded.
Some asshole made that point here a few days ago.
They feel for the "he needs more time" logic and now they're going to be stuck with a permanent interim coach.
I would've punted but it worked
I would've punted but it worked
You go for it when you are the inferior team. Playing for OT is a terrible idea.
How did they lose to Notre Dame?
How did they lose to Notre Dame?
Notre Dame is better than everyone in the Pac-12.
Hope this helps.
Also, it would be hilarious if USC lost in Boulder next week. It's a classic letdown/lookahead trap game.
How did they lose to Notre Dame?
Notre Dame is better than everyone in the Pac-12.
Hope this helps.
Also, it would be hilarious if USC lost in Boulder next week. It's a classic letdown/lookahead trap game.
Normally I'd agree but Colorado is really awful. Remember Cal doesn't count.
2013 USC > 2012 UWHow did they lose to Notre Dame?
Notre Dame is better than everyone in the Pac-12.
Hope this helps.
Also, it would be hilarious if USC lost in Boulder next week. It's a classic letdown/lookahead trap game.
Normally I'd agree but Colorado is really awful. Remember Cal doesn't count.
That's part of the script. USC will take them for granted. See the 2012 Apple Cup for details.
How did they lose to Notre Dame?
Notre Dame is better than everyone in the Pac-12.
Hope this helps.
Also, it would be hilarious if USC lost in Boulder next week. It's a classic letdown/lookahead trap game.
Normally I'd agree but Colorado is really awful. Remember Cal doesn't count.
That's part of the script. USC will take them for granted. See the 2012 Apple Cup for details.