Oregon Ducks Surprising Betting Odds vs. Washington Released

dtd said:
WoolleyDoog said:
RaceBannon said:
Oregon didn't get the usual dick sucking this year because of Ohio State last year
Washington can't get ranked because of 6-7 last year
For Oregon to be favored less than 2023 is retarded
School colors aside they should beat up Washington like Ohio State and Michigan did this year
I guess that's why they play the game
Click to expand...
It was the Indiana loss. The bot and bought media was frothing at the mouth before that game made them have to shut up.
The line is very friendly for UW. They are getting a lot of credit for being at home
The 2023 line was all time bad example of transactional or transitional victory valuing.
Click to expand...
You have no idea how the lines work. It's all math. UW won those 3 games, 3 of the worst losses in Oregon history. Credit to UW. "Vegas" lines are the singular best way to predict outcomes, OR THEY WOULD NOT EXIST. Ahem.
Click to expand...
So, those three losses?
 
My guess is four if our line holds up (no one is held out). Fewer than last year but not necessarily cataclysmic……….
 
Last edited:
HFNY said:
It's kind of the same thing for the Huskies too, depending on who Oregon has healthy at WR. Alex McLaughlin is pretty good and should be able to hold up pretty well against Sadiq in man-to-man coverage. For a LB, ZRS is good in coverage too.
I don't see the Huskies being able to establish the run all that well, even if Coleman is back. Fisch / Daugherty may be able to mix things up some by having both Coleman and Mohammed in the backfield together and manufacture some yards that way. Unfortunately, they may have to pass some to set up the run but they should absolutely not abandon the run. I'm sure Fisch will add in some screens and other semi-run like plays.
I sure hope Boston is ready to go because he is the guy who will either A) punish Oregon for single covering him B) draw pass interference penalties and / or C) force Oregon to roll coverage toward him, which would open things up for DeGraaf and other WRs.
Click to expand...
From What I've seen of late, Washington is your best option at RB. He hits the hole the fastest and doesn't dance. I don't think he's an every down back but he needs more carries IMO.
 
RoadTrip said:
HFNY said:
It's kind of the same thing for the Huskies too, depending on who Oregon has healthy at WR. Alex McLaughlin is pretty good and should be able to hold up pretty well against Sadiq in man-to-man coverage. For a LB, ZRS is good in coverage too.
I don't see the Huskies being able to establish the run all that well, even if Coleman is back. Fisch / Daugherty may be able to mix things up some by having both Coleman and Mohammed in the backfield together and manufacture some yards that way. Unfortunately, they may have to pass some to set up the run but they should absolutely not abandon the run. I'm sure Fisch will add in some screens and other semi-run like plays.
I sure hope Boston is ready to go because he is the guy who will either A) punish Oregon for single covering him B) draw pass interference penalties and / or C) force Oregon to roll coverage toward him, which would open things up for DeGraaf and other WRs.
Click to expand...
From What I've seen of late, Washington is your best option at RB. He hits the hole the fastest and doesn't dance. I don't think he's an every down back but he needs more carries IMO.
Click to expand...
Wait, what team are you a fan of? Gorillas?
 
greenblood said:
Ducks have injuries on the O line and UW’s strength is their D line. It’s a matchup problem and I’m all over UW on the spread, and I’m sprinkling the moneyline.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure UW's strength on D is the DL. It was the glaring weakness heading into the year but Elinneus Davis has developed some (RS-Soph), Arizona transfer Tuiagaleilei has been pretty good as a 3-tech, and Bryce Butler and Anterio Thompson (Butler was a JC guy, played a little last year then redshirted while Thompson has bounced around from from JC and D-1) have come on. Fortunately, UW has two massive reserve DTs in case there are 3rd and 4th's and short.
Lane and Durfee are solid as rush guys and Lynch has been a batted down pass machine but the 4th DE is a true frosh (Devin Hyde), unless Isaiah Ward finally comes back (more of a pass-rush specialist).
It certainly isn't a weakness at this point in the season though. If Manu was playing, I'd say that LBs are the strength and if Tacario Davis comes back, secondary could be a strength too since Prysock has been playing better lately and McLaughling is a very good safety. Esteen is an interesting 6th year Husky, at times he whiffs on tackles and then other times, he looks like a veteran safety who can make some plays. Touted frosh Rylon Dillard-Allen has taken some snaps from him and has the most upside.
 
dtd said:
WoolleyDoog said:
RaceBannon said:
Oregon didn't get the usual dick sucking this year because of Ohio State last year
Washington can't get ranked because of 6-7 last year
For Oregon to be favored less than 2023 is retarded
School colors aside they should beat up Washington like Ohio State and Michigan did this year
I guess that's why they play the game
Click to expand...
It was the Indiana loss. The bot and bought media was frothing at the mouth before that game made them have to shut up.
The line is very friendly for UW. They are getting a lot of credit for being at home
The 2023 line was all time bad example of transactional or transitional victory valuing.
Click to expand...
You have no idea how the lines work. It's all math. UW won those 3 games, 3 of the worst losses in Oregon history. Credit to UW. "Vegas" lines are the singular best way to predict outcomes, OR THEY WOULD NOT EXIST. Ahem.
Click to expand...
You think Vegas just sets the line at what they think the game will be? You realize they are in it to make money right? Or did you think there was some kind of hive mind supercomputer named "Vegas"
If they think they can get thousands of coked up off season natty duck fans to drop their rent money on a "crazy low line bro" then they will and do and did
 
digits said:
TheHB said:
UW's running game has looked better with Coleman out. He looks done to me.
Click to expand...
Coleman had no business suiting up vs UCLA, let alone getting carries.

Mohammed is one of the oddest backs I can think of that's played for UW. He looks out of control and about to fall down whilst running, yet has a pretty decent AVG and gets the job done mostly.

Jordan Washington is a burner, I really like what he's bringing to the offense.
Click to expand...
Whilst?

Also, mostly agree. Muhammad has about as much wiggle as you can expect from a guy as large as he is. Derrick Henry's don't grow on trees.
 
img-2377.jpeg

LFG
 
HFNY said:
It's kind of the same thing for the Huskies too, depending on who Oregon has healthy at WR. Alex McLaughlin is pretty good and should be able to hold up pretty well against Sadiq in man-to-man coverage. For a LB, ZRS is good in coverage too.
I don't see the Huskies being able to establish the run all that well, even if Coleman is back. Fisch / Daugherty may be able to mix things up some by having both Coleman and Mohammed in the backfield together and manufacture some yards that way. Unfortunately, they may have to pass some to set up the run but they should absolutely not abandon the run. I'm sure Fisch will add in some screens and other semi-run like plays.
I sure hope Boston is ready to go because he is the guy who will either A) punish Oregon for single covering him B) draw pass interference penalties and / or C) force Oregon to roll coverage toward him, which would open things up for DeGraaf and other WRs.
Click to expand...
McLaughlin and Sadiq one-on-one is advantage Ducks
 
WoolleyDoog said:
RoadTrip said:
HFNY said:
It's kind of the same thing for the Huskies too, depending on who Oregon has healthy at WR. Alex McLaughlin is pretty good and should be able to hold up pretty well against Sadiq in man-to-man coverage. For a LB, ZRS is good in coverage too.
I don't see the Huskies being able to establish the run all that well, even if Coleman is back. Fisch / Daugherty may be able to mix things up some by having both Coleman and Mohammed in the backfield together and manufacture some yards that way. Unfortunately, they may have to pass some to set up the run but they should absolutely not abandon the run. I'm sure Fisch will add in some screens and other semi-run like plays.
I sure hope Boston is ready to go because he is the guy who will either A) punish Oregon for single covering him B) draw pass interference penalties and / or C) force Oregon to roll coverage toward him, which would open things up for DeGraaf and other WRs.
Click to expand...
From What I've seen of late, Washington is your best option at RB. He hits the hole the fastest and doesn't dance. I don't think he's an every down back but he needs more carries IMO.
Click to expand...
Wait, what team are you a fan of? Gorillas?
Click to expand...
Ubiquitous your. Our? best option seems to be Washington of late.
 
WoolleyDoog said:
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LoneStarDawg said:
I appreciate that every year it’s the greatest Oregon team of all time until it’s not
Click to expand...
not even quooks are thinking that after indiana pantsed them
Click to expand...
That was the come to Jesus moment. Actually, the Northwestern game for those that were woke. Things were awfully exciting after Montoozle State and Oklahomo State.
Click to expand...
Retard ducks here were ready to play the Seahawks after stomping the lifeless corpse of Gundy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top