Oregon Ducks 2016 Football Schedule At A Glance

[MikeSeaver]

"As I said, you all used to run Rose Bowel!!!!11!! as your bread and butter until Oregon started winning them."

We all did?

(That's Raycist! .gif)

I've always thought Rose Bowls were nice consolation prizes for teams that failed to win it all. apparently not.

But since you're trying so hard to bring UW into this discussion, I'll indulge you with the inner doog you seem so certain is just itching to come out...

1/2 NATTY > ZERO!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!' Take that Oregon!!!!!!!!! Whoregon!!!!!!!!111111

Oh gosh, that feels so much better. Thank you.

You still listed Alamo Bowl and Runners up medals when those are clearly not Oregons highest achievments. Nor would any Duck use those as evidence of them being "winners" as it was being used.

You were being intellectually dishonest and still are.

Very strange

 

[MakaDawg]

I'm sorry my sarcasm tainted your noble intellectual integrity. The Rose Bowl wins don't make Oregon a winner either, in my opinion, which can clearly be discerned from my frivolous argument.

You disagree, aand that's great.

 

[MikeSeaver]

I'm sorry my sarcasm tainted your noble intellectual integrity. The Rose Bowl wins don't make Oregon a winner either, in my opinion, which can clearly be discerned from my frivolous argument.

You disagree, aand that's great.

There's nothing intellectual about it. At least to me anyway. You left out their highest accomplishments wether you see them fit to be celebrated or not.

Considering you don't have any affinity for BCS wins, (most notably, Rose Bowl wins) it seems like you would have listed those in the first place to make your point even more devastating to Duck readers.

I just think you're just being deliberately dishonest. Or maybe you're just not very good at this and I'm giving you too much credit.

 

[MakaDawg]

I'm sorry my sarcasm tainted your noble intellectual integrity. The Rose Bowl wins don't make Oregon a winner either, in my opinion, which can clearly be discerned from my frivolous argument.

You disagree, aand that's great.

There's nothing intellectual about it. At least to me anyway. You left out their highest accomplishments wether you see them fit to be celebrated or not.

Considering you don't have any affinity for BCS wins, (most notably, Rose Bowl wins) it seems like you would have listed those in the first place to make your point even more devastating to Duck readers.

I just think you're just being deliberately dishonest. Or maybe you're just not very good at this and I'm giving you too much credit.

Abundance.

 

[MikeSeaver]

I'm sorry my sarcasm tainted your noble intellectual integrity. The Rose Bowl wins don't make Oregon a winner either, in my opinion, which can clearly be discerned from my frivolous argument.

You disagree, aand that's great.

There's nothing intellectual about it. At least to me anyway. You left out their highest accomplishments wether you see them fit to be celebrated or not.

Considering you don't have any affinity for BCS wins, (most notably, Rose Bowl wins) it seems like you would have listed those in the first place to make your point even more devastating to Duck readers.

I just think you're just being deliberately dishonest. Or maybe you're just not very good at this and I'm giving you too much credit.

Abundance.

As always...