One of the many quaint beliefs the Left has about the US is that it's a relatively low-tax country

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

 

[WestlinnDuck]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

Somebody needs to pay for those programs that we can't do without - like open borders, the green gaia religious fraud, public education that doesn't educate and welfare payments to able bodied people and to end the homeless problem that we treat like spreading more pigeon feed and then can't figure out why there are more pigeons.

 

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

 

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

 

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

 

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

"Swamp GOP" were your words.

How is referencing your support for Daddy not responsive?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

"Swamp GOP" were your words.

How is your support for Daddy not responsive?

"Everyone does it" is your conflationary argument.

Yeah, sure, there's literally no difference in any government spending or context whatsoever. 1 trillion on infrastructure in a recession vs. 3 trillion on entitlements during stagflation. Send out the checks for $1,000,000 because it's all the same.

I mean, I guess we've established you are bad at economics but this is right there with oil production doesn't effect price.

 

[hardhat]

The US is not a low tax country, and does a much worse job spending and allocating its tax revenue.

 

[HHusky]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

"Swamp GOP" were your words.

How is your support for Daddy not responsive?

"Everyone does it" is your conflationary argument.

Yeah, sure, there's literally no difference in any government spending or context whatsoever. 1 trillion on infrastructure in a recession vs. 3 trillion on entitlements during stagflation. Send out the checks for $1,000,000 because it's all the same.

I mean, I guess we've established you are bad at economics but this is right there with oil production doesn't effect price.

Daddy was all on board with the tax cut bill when everything seemed to be going fine. Growing deficits in fat times, just like the "swamp GOP".

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

"Swamp GOP" were your words.

How is your support for Daddy not responsive?

"Everyone does it" is your conflationary argument.

Yeah, sure, there's literally no difference in any government spending or context whatsoever. 1 trillion on infrastructure in a recession vs. 3 trillion on entitlements during stagflation. Send out the checks for $1,000,000 because it's all the same.

I mean, I guess we've established you are bad at economics but this is right there with oil production doesn't effect price.

Daddy was all on board with the tax cut bill when everything seemed to be going fine. Growing deficits in fat times, just like the "swamp GOP".

Tax cuts are literally part of how you shrink government but sure, good argument?

Are you going to go ahead with the "how do we pay for tax cuts" fallacy next?

 

[hardhat]

So then we've agreed that the US is a high tax country that we get little in return for.

H is just stating there's no way to fix it.

Sounds like a hell of an argument for not passing any future spending. We can at least shrink government as a % of gdp that way.

No, he is saying that we need to raise taxes even higher.

We're not a high tax country, at all. We do need to raise taxes without even considering any new discretionary spending, which will also happen . . . under either party.

So we can get nothing good in return. Genius!

Telling you that you will die someday is not the same as rooting for you to die.

There is no political will to shrink government. [/b]

There's a difference between small and large growth.

Good job, good effort.

There are differences between large and small deficits and good and bad economies too. The GOP has run up massive deficits when the economy was humming; its claims to fiscal prudence require we ignore its recent history.

I'm impressed you agree with the criticism most here have of the swamp GOP.

Kind of at odds with your defense of Liz though.

Cuz Daddy is the figurehead of fiscal discipline, of course.

There's the cope.

But daddy!

Welcome to 2021. Care to discuss the current trillions in entitlement stimulus for an economy that is already overheated with inflation?

"Swamp GOP" were your words.

How is your support for Daddy not responsive?

"Everyone does it" is your conflationary argument.

Yeah, sure, there's literally no difference in any government spending or context whatsoever. 1 trillion on infrastructure in a recession vs. 3 trillion on entitlements during stagflation. Send out the checks for $1,000,000 because it's all the same.

I mean, I guess we've established you are bad at economics but this is right there with oil production doesn't effect price.

Daddy was all on board with the tax cut bill when everything seemed to be going fine. Growing deficits in fat times, just like the "swamp GOP".

Daddy made the maximum SALT deduction $10,000. Senile daddy got rid of that.

 

[RaceBannon]

H has no interest in Biden or current events

Daddy issues are severe

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Too bad Ross Perot is dead.

That motherfucker explained government finance/deficits/debt better than any human over the past 100 years.

 

[Kaepsknee]

100% this. Add up all the fed, state, and local level taxes and the tax burden goes way up.

 

[greenblood]

You guys made HHusky angry, Biden is fucking with his mojo.

 

[thechatch]

Paid 42% tax rate in Sweden, got free health care, free full time childcare (8:30am to 4pm), and $100 a month unlimited metro card.

US I get taxed 28% and get toll roads

I get taxed a lot more than 28% and still get toll roads.

Bullshit. No you don’t.

I'm really disappointed in you ladies. This is one of your favorite subjects, that we're not taxed enough. Did your booster shot have some side effects?

There is zero chance any of you gals pays 28% of your income in taxes. Basic math fail.

Is this where we drop our 941s and 1120S filings on the table or would you rather see a FY2020 P&L and figure it out for yourself?

Fuck off.