Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government.
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
Totally agree that he is far from conservative.
However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.
Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.
From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.
Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.
Math.