Ole Miss ranked #22 with a 3-3 record

I don't care who you are you and who you played; you should not be top 25 in week 8 without a winning record.

Fucking east coast SEC bias.
 
Look no further than Wilner from the Merc who has a 2 loss Wisconsin above UW and yet he doesn't punish Michigan for having the same strength as UW. The bias of any journalist being analysts of games they don't watch is crazy...75 years in a row
 
Last edited:
Look no further than Wilner from the Merc who has a 2 loss Wisconsin above UW and yet he doesn't punish Michigan for having the same strength as UW. The bias of any journalist being analysts of games they don't watch is crazy...75 years in a row

Michigan has beaten Colorado and Wisconsin, but still.
 
Look no further than Wilner from the Merc who has a 2 loss Wisconsin above UW and yet he doesn't punish Michigan for having the same strength as UW. The bias of any journalist being analysts of games they don't watch is crazy...75 years in a row

Close only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. A loss is a loss is a loss.

 
Wilner has UW rated lower than anyone else.

The beat writer for SCar has a boner for us though.

Cu6TPZ7VYAESnAC.jpg
 
Last edited:
my first guess is that the SC beat writer hasn't watched any UW games because they're either on a network he'd have to be in China to get or they're too late at night. Second, guys like Wilner make comments like "UW barely beat Arizona, so I can't rank them very high." while he forgets that it was on the road and then he doesn't mention that Clemson went to OT at home against a shitty NC State team. There is just no way the writers have any business ranking teams.
 
also remember, Wilner is the dumbass who moved Texas from unranked to #2 after they beat Notre Dame in their opener...unranked to #2 by beating Notre fucking Dame.
 
This is legit. Do you guys even remember who is on that team? Stringfellow. I watched Ole Miss play a couple of times. Let's just say Stringfellow catches more than he drops. But not by much.
 
Wisconsin is #10 with two losses. Why? Because they beat LSU

SEC baby

And because they are good and should have beaten tOSU. Did you see the 4th quarter jump around? There are about two teams that wouldn't have 2 losses with that schedule and they are named Bama and UW (DOOG)!
 
Look no further than Wilner from the Merc who has a 2 loss Wisconsin above UW and yet he doesn't punish Michigan for having the same strength as UW. The bias of any journalist being analysts of games they don't watch is crazy...75 years in a row

Michigan has beaten Colorado and Wisconsin, but still.

Washington beat Oregon ...

Nothing else matters.
 
Back
Top