the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
so BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
I knew you would take this stance. Fuck off, he turned his back and hit him with his shoulder. It's on the QB for throwing a hospital pass and the WR for lowering his headso BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
The defender is responsible for avoiding the head.
It's a bad hit that was correctly called as targeting
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Shoulder to the head is targeting.
Read the rule:http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
yes. notice how I said the rule is retarded.the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Shoulder to the head is targeting.
Read the rule:http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
I knew you would take this stance. Fuck off, he turned his back and hit him with his shoulder. It's on the QB for throwing a hospital pass and the WR for lowering his headso BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
The defender is responsible for avoiding the head.
It's a bad hit that was correctly called as targeting
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Shoulder to the head is targeting.
Read the rule:http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changed
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Shoulder to the head is targeting.
Read the rule:http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changed
If it ever changes again, it will become tougher against the defense.
The NCAA has to keep moving forward on player safety.
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitThat wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Shoulder to the head is targeting.
Read the rule:http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changed
If it ever changes again, it will become tougher against the defense.
The NCAA has to keep moving forward on player safety.
I agree that is the case. They might even end up not allowing offensive players to lower their heads.