Official Iran conflict game thread.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
And if you want to support Ukraine against Russia, we’ve removed a major supplier of Iranian attack drones off of that battlefield and are forcing China and Russia to stop buying black market oil at reduced prices thereby leveling the playing field regarding g our respective economies.
Click to expand...
Huh? Russia is hardly an oil importer. With the combination of sanctions relief and skyrocketing oil prices, we just saved Russia's ass for the umpteenth time.

And, when asked about Russia helping Iran target Americans, Vlad's pocket holder still can't acknowledge Russian culpability for anything. Never has, never will. Why?

il_fullxfull.6838257654_e3b3.webp
 
EverettChris said:
Bad news for the America Last crew?

https://twitter.com/x/status/2031005762395504647

ANALYSIS:
A-I analysis confirms the wings of the munition in question sit about 40%-45% down the body of the munition. On a Tomahawk, the wings sit roughly 49%-50% down the body of the munition.

The wing to body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile.

Further, the video shows the munition in a steep dive angle for the final attack phase. This places the attack angle at approximately 70%, which is the max attack angle for a Tomahawk.

The attack angle does not match the KH-55. That angle maxes out at about 55 degrees. So what would have caused this?

CONCLUSION:
The wing positioning alone makes the munition impossible to be a Tomahawk. The attack angle is at the max of the Tomahawk's capabilities. The typical attack angle for a Tomahawk is much lower than 70 degrees. The typical angle is between 20-45 degrees.

This is due to the flight pattern of Tomahawks. They fly very low horizontally to the ground, often only 50-100 meters AGL to avoid detection and interception. In order to achieve that attack angle, the missile would have had to gain altitude several kilometers away, this would leave it vulnerable for interception. This is highly unlikely on the first day of US attacks.

So what could have caused this?
Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.

If the KH-55's signal was jammed, this could result in an uncontrollable dive. Think of GPS jamming more like disorienting the missile.

On 03/07 President Trump stated:
“No, in my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.”

Today, I concur with the President.
Click to expand...
I'm gonna assume you will never accept American responsibility for the school bombing despite it being cut and dry. You will continue to find X posts that deny it, and you will treat them as gospel, because you're a fucking coward who has big problems with reality.
 
Last edited:
CallMeBigErn said:
I'm gonna assume you will never accept American responsibility for the school bombing despite it being cut and dry. You will continue to find X posts that deny it, and you will treat them as gospel, because you're a fucking coward who has big problems with reality.
Click to expand...
You believe the fake news.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
I'm gonna assume you will never accept American responsibility for the school bombing despite it being cut and dry. You will continue to find X posts that deny it, and you will treat them as gospel, because you're a fucking coward who has big problems with reality.
Click to expand...
War sucks. Innocent people die.

Iranian mullah terrorists are bad and needed to be dealt with before they had a nuke.

Next.
 
EverettChris said:
Bad news for the America Last crew?

https://twitter.com/x/status/2031005762395504647

ANALYSIS:
A-I analysis confirms the wings of the munition in question sit about 40%-45% down the body of the munition. On a Tomahawk, the wings sit roughly 49%-50% down the body of the munition.

The wing to body ratio of the munition in question matches an Iranian Kh-55–derived Land Attack Cruise Missile.

Further, the video shows the munition in a steep dive angle for the final attack phase. This places the attack angle at approximately 70%, which is the max attack angle for a Tomahawk.

The attack angle does not match the KH-55. That angle maxes out at about 55 degrees. So what would have caused this?

CONCLUSION:
The wing positioning alone makes the munition impossible to be a Tomahawk. The attack angle is at the max of the Tomahawk's capabilities. The typical attack angle for a Tomahawk is much lower than 70 degrees. The typical angle is between 20-45 degrees.

This is due to the flight pattern of Tomahawks. They fly very low horizontally to the ground, often only 50-100 meters AGL to avoid detection and interception. In order to achieve that attack angle, the missile would have had to gain altitude several kilometers away, this would leave it vulnerable for interception. This is highly unlikely on the first day of US attacks.

So what could have caused this?
Simply put, GPS jamming of an Iranian KH-55. The USA and Israel were, and continue to actively jam the Iranian airspace.

If the KH-55's signal was jammed, this could result in an uncontrollable dive. Think of GPS jamming more like disorienting the missile.

On 03/07 President Trump stated:
“No, in my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.”

Today, I concur with the President.
Click to expand...
Buck, since Ern is too retarded to figure this out, give us your proof that refutes this analysis and directly pins it on a US or Israeli weapon. Anybody on team whacko who is not pining for the US to fail?
 
CallMeBigErn said:
I'm gonna assume you will never accept American responsibility for the school bombing despite it being cut and dry. You will continue to find X posts that deny it, and you will treat them as gospel, because you're a fucking coward who has big problems with reality.
Click to expand...
I’ve yet to see anything the proves it was a US missile. The video evidence that does exist points to Iran. Feel free to debunk it, retard.

America Lasters like you automatically will blame this country, though, because you’re just a fucking mess Ern.
 
Leftards lie and love to be lied to. Remember when the Israelis blew up the hospital in Gaza and killed 500. Except it was a Pali missile that fell short and blew up the parking lot. So leftards lie or are really stupid and in most cases both.

www.powerlineblog.com

Lies, Damned Lies, and Journalism | Power Line

www.powerlineblog.com www.powerlineblog.com

Lies, Damned Lies, and Journalism​

An elementary school in Iran was hit by an unknown missile during the first day of our bombardment of that country. The press in the U.S., as well as in Iran and other countries, is desperate to blame the explosion on the United States. Leading the way, as usual, is the New York Times.

The Times goes to great lengths to try to blame the school bombing on the U.S. military. Headline: “U.S. Tomahawk Hit Naval Base Beside Iranian School, Video Shows.” That’s odd: not that the Tomahawk hit the school, but rather that it hit a nearby military target. So what? The subhed is an outright lie by the Times: “The evidence contradicts President Trump’s claim that Iran was responsible for a strike at the school that killed 175 people, most of them children.”

The Times story is based on two sources, Iranian state media and a “research collective” called Bellingcat. It involves painstaking reconstruction of a video that shows a Tomahawk missile hitting its target. The emphasis is on evidence that the missile was indeed a Tomahawk, which is unique to the U.S. military. But so what? This is the key information, which a casual reader of headlines will not catch:

A Times analysis of the video shows the missile striking a building described as a medical clinic in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps base. Plumes of smoke and debris shoot out of the building after it is hit as the distant screams of onlookers are heard.

As the camera pans to the right, large plumes of dust and smoke are already billowing from the area around the elementary school, suggesting that it had been struck shortly before the strike on the naval base.
Click to expand...
So the Tomahawk didn’t hit the school, it hit the naval base. And the video indicates that at that point, the school had already been struck. By what? We don’t know, but the one thing we know for sure is that it wasn’t the Tomahawk. My guess is that the military investigation will conclude that the school was struck by an errant Iranian missile, but by that time the left-wing press will have firmly implanted the assumption that it was ours.

The story was picked up by the London Times, which did exactly the same thing: the headline says “Tomahawk video adds to evidence US hit Iranian girls’ school,” but the story demonstrates the opposite:

Video footage appears to confirm that an American Tomahawk missile hit an Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) facility near an elementary school in Minab, Iran.

The footage adds to mounting evidence pointing to the United States being responsible for the airstrike on a girls’ school that killed 175 people, most of them young girls.
Click to expand...
That is, to put it mildly, a non sequitur. The Times helpfully adds this graphic from Bellingcat showing the hypothetical impact zone of the Tomahawk that hit the naval base:Weirdly, the paper doesn’t comment on the fact that the impact zone does not include the school.

1773076375269.webp


Journalism as we once knew it has effectively ceased to exist. What we have now is a permanent war against the West, the United States, the Republican Party and the Trump administration. We are past the point where you can rely on anything you read in a newspaper, other than sports scores.
 
BleachedAnusDawg said:
Buck, since Ern is too retarded to figure this out, give us your proof that refutes this analysis and directly pins it on a US or Israeli weapon. Anybody on team whacko who is not pining fo
Click to expand...
When you let a MAGA X account's "AI analysis" trump all the proof provided by multiple agencies and US officials, there is no amount of convincing that will get you to change your mind.

I thought you had acknowledged it when you said "It happens", but maybe not.
 
Will need to hear Big Red's analysis of the entire situation. Including technical analysis of how many innocents were killed during the Obama administration. Or did he join during the Biden trans-attractive era?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top