Iranian nukes were only a threat to Israel POTD.
Official Iran conflict game thread.
- Thread starter PurpleThrobber
- Start date
An Iranian nuclear strike on Israel and the Middle East capitols would all be bubbling glass. But thankfully, that wouldn't impact US gasoline prices as we all know.
China downgraded their GDP figures (they usually just lie).
Doogbot out front on this one.
The trick is going to be fucking the CCP without blowing up the rest of the world markets. Setting the US up as the arbiter of the straight of Hormuz is a really good step in that direction.
If it's very short, it's worth it. Let those countries do some of the heavy lifting
if it's a forever war and/or WW3, it's ridiculous
I will complain about gas prices either way. Get used to it.
if it's a forever war and/or WW3, it's ridiculous
I will complain about gas prices either way. Get used to it.
Is Haie running this operation or something? (When he’s not eating out chatch’s pussy)
Few questions:
1) Why are we doing this ?
2) How long will this operation expected to take
3) How do we know if we’re successful. Whats our measurement of success?
“Because” is not a reason. And since the government works for me, I want answers to the simple questions that should’ve already have had an answer.
Few questions:
1) Why are we doing this ?
2) How long will this operation expected to take
3) How do we know if we’re successful. Whats our measurement of success?
“Because” is not a reason. And since the government works for me, I want answers to the simple questions that should’ve already have had an answer.
“Your” government works for illegal aliens and attacks ICE and the military when a GOP is president.
Fuck off, lightweight. You deserve no answers. I doubt you can even vote here.
1. No nukes, no terror sponsorship, no ballistic missiles.
2. Not forever. I've said give it a month and LIPO.
3. No nukes, no terror sponsorship, no ballistic missiles.
Mainly no nukes that would be a success. The rest would be nice. If we stop before a month to just talk with the Iranian liars - that would be unfortunate.
2. Not forever. I've said give it a month and LIPO.
3. No nukes, no terror sponsorship, no ballistic missiles.
Mainly no nukes that would be a success. The rest would be nice. If we stop before a month to just talk with the Iranian liars - that would be unfortunate.
100%
We all we got we all we need
We don't do that anymore.
Where do you draw the line? Days, weeks, months, years? The world has kicked the can on this problem - it had to be dealt with at some point.
It's important to wait until Iran told us that they had nukes and would use them. Then that would be the time to take them out. But not before. Millions dead are worth more than taking away their ability to make nukes and a delivery system than could hit the US.
Pitchfork51
Active poster
1. Because we can.
2. Until they capitulate and agree to install a pro American leader.
3. Aforementioned pro American leader.
47 years of this shit. That’s why.
SECDAWG
Active poster
Ironic “47” years of this shit and WHO is POTUS 47???
It STARTED 47 years ago. It ENDS with 47.
Guess what? FAFO