Vaccinated against what?The girls don’t do nuance.
Yes, if healthcare rationing is required—and in truth it always is—I would prefer those who have been vaccinated to those who have not. ‘Cuz unlike some here, I’m not retarded.
Vaccinated against what?The girls don’t do nuance.
Yes, if healthcare rationing is required—and in truth it always is—I would prefer those who have been vaccinated to those who have not. ‘Cuz unlike some here, I’m not retarded.
I have absolutely zero problem with rationing on those bases as well. Also, age. Survivability is completely reasonable to consider.It would make more sense to ration on the basis of likelihood of survival, if the condition was self-induced (smoking), obesity, etc. Interesting that you rush to selection based upon submission to the government.
Obsesity is a longevity factor.I have absolutely zero problem with rationing on those bases as well. Also, age. Survivability is completely reasonable to consider.
There used to be an expectation that recipients of services would have complied with a vaccination schedule. I realize that you gals view that as fascism, but I’m old enough to remember when Republican voters were the smarter people in the room.Vaccinated against what?
Not terribly true, actually. But it is a predictor for the quality of survival, so I’m all for putting it on the list.Obsesity is a longevity factor.
Well, bye.Dazzler.
For what procedure/care?Would you have rationed care on a 70 year old vaxxed up fatty versus a 6’1 180 pound 30 year old that was pureblood?
The authoritarian vaxxers starting point for punishing those who didn't get vaxxed if they had a scientific point. But SCIENCE had nothing to do with denying care or putting them into camp if they weren't vaxxed. "Uh, I just recovered from the Wuhan Flue last month, I have better immunity than the clot shot." Tough, get vaxxed. I'm young and healthy with no pre-existing conditions." "Tough, get vaxxed. Als would have helped if the shots worked asWould you have rationed care on a 70 year old vaxxed up fatty versus a 6’1 180 pound 30 year old that was pureblood?
Anything requiring resources and a bed. It doesn’t matter really.For what procedure/care?
“Oh god! Uncle Gasbag is here!”, cried the kids.The authoritarian vaxxers starting point for punishing those who didn't get vaxxed if they had a scientific point. But SCIENCE had nothing to do with denying care or putting them into camp if they weren't vaxxed. "Uh, I just recovered from the Wuhan Flue last month, I have better immunity than the clot shot." Tough, get vaxxed. I'm young and healthy with no pre-existing conditions." "Tough, get vaxxed. Als would have helped if the shots worked asadvertisedproganidized.
There are all sorts of care and treatment with unique risks. “It doesn’t matter” isn’t really an answer nor is it accurate.Anything requiring resources and a bed. It doesn’t matter really.
Being fat and/or old was far more dangerous than being unvaxxed.
@HHuskyIt would make more sense to ration on the basis of likelihood of survival, if the condition was self-induced (smoking), obesity, etc. Interesting that you rush to selection based upon submission to the government.
@HHusky
The guy who wanted pre-existing conditions for a reason to deny insurance eliminated, also wanted to deny care to people paying for health insurance for not taking an experimental shot.
Oh, and he also is fine with illegals who were not vaccinated getting free medical care.
Is that planning, off-ramp or pivot?