Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Deleted User]
  • Start date Start date
I like the combination of "Sark left the program in better shape" and "OMG things were so fucking terrible we went 0-12 and had the worst roster ever" arguments. Who wasn't going to leave the program in better shape under those conditions?
Click to expand...

By that shit tier argument of leaving the program in better shape than he inherited you could say Ty did his job since there was more talent in 2009 roster than 2005.

That argument is fucktarded and pulling an AuburnDoog. If someone told you at that initial KICK ASS presser Sark would go 34-29, 31-29 vs FBS, 19-17 vs conference and have his best season be 5-4 in conference play you would have said that was a failure.

Yet Doogs now move the Goal Posts and say shit like "well the program is better off than when he got here. We were 0-12 what did you expect? "
 
Can I come to this SoftyFS/HHB meetup?

Most of you guys owe me a BJ, and I think there's a pretty good chance that softy would thumb my prostate.
 
I like the combination of "Sark left the program in better shape" and "OMG things were so fucking terrible we went 0-12 and had the worst roster ever" arguments. Who wasn't going to leave the program in better shape under those conditions?
Click to expand...

By that shit tier argument of leaving the program in better shape than he inherited you could say Ty did his job since there was more talent in 2009 roster than 2005.

That argument is fucktarded and pulling an AuburnDoog. If someone told you at that initial KICK ASS presser Sark would go 34-29, 31-29 vs FBS, 19-17 vs conference and have his best season be 5-4 in conference play you would have said that was a failure.

Yet Doogs now move the Goal Posts and say shit like "well the program is better off than when he got here. We were 0-12 what did you expect? "
Click to expand...
Especially if they would have told you he had 11 NFL players on the roster, Jake was going to stay two more years and only miss one more game due to injury.

I think there's some who really believed Sark inherited 0-12 talent. If you watched the 08 team I can see why you would have been deceived into believing that. They were terrible. But the awfulness was a combination of losing the one decent QB on the roster and quitting on their coach. Neither of those factors ever applied again.

The further we get away from 08 the better the jerb Sark inherited looks, and the worse the jerb he did with it.
 
Last edited:
I like the combination of "Sark left the program in better shape" and "OMG things were so fucking terrible we went 0-12 and had the worst roster ever" arguments. Who wasn't going to leave the program in better shape under those conditions?
Click to expand...

By that shit tier argument of leaving the program in better shape than he inherited you could say Ty did his job since there was more talent in 2009 roster than 2005.

That argument is fucktarded and pulling an AuburnDoog. If someone told you at that initial KICK ASS presser Sark would go 34-29, 31-29 vs FBS, 19-17 vs conference and have his best season be 5-4 in conference play you would have said that was a failure.

Yet Doogs now move the Goal Posts and say shit like "well the program is better off than when he got here. We were 0-12 what did you expect? "
Click to expand...
Especially if they would have told you he had 11 NFL players on the roster, Jake was going to stay two more years and only miss one more game due to injury.

I think there's some who really believed Sark inherited 0-12 talent. If you watched the 08 team I can see why you would have been deceived into believing that. They were terrible. But the awfulness was a combination of losing the one decent QB on the roster and hating their coach. Neither of those factors ever applied again.

The further we get away from 08 the better the jerb Sark inherited looks, and the worse the jerb he did with it.
Click to expand...

I thought with a healthy Jake the Huskies would make a bowl game in 2009 even after 0-12. I knew that's how much of a gap between Jake/Fouch was and the gap between an able body/Ty was going to be. Plus 2008 lost Chris Polk after just two games.

So how would the 2009 team have done had they had no Locker or Polk? I'm guessing 0-12 as well(maybe 1-11 since WSU was so bad but they were in 2008 so who knows?).

Whenever I bring that up I get the "but, still Sark had to change the mindset of 0-12" which he did a good job of that quickly going 4-5 in conference. Unfortunately he peaked in year two going 5-4 and stayed at 5-4 the following three seasons after that as well.
 

I emailed Softy about coming on the podcast but he never replied. We were in a twitter conversation and he said he would come on the show.
Click to expand...

Doogman style.

praying-dog-boy.jpg


 
I emailed Softy about coming on the podcast but he never replied. We were in a twitter conversation and he said he would come on the show.
Click to expand...

You can always meet up with him and ambush him there. Start the interview as you meet up for Lunch. Record like a 5-10 minute soundbite.
 
You guys sure love your Husky football! Can't say the same for this Softy dude. Softy? Just how did he get that name? Would a real man want to be call Softy? Soft what? You know what I am saying.
 
Super secret cell phone recording
Click to expand...

Just put him on the spot and say if you can record a 5-10 minute sound bite. You said yourself in person it's easier to corner someone.
 
That's the direct approach.

If you think he's going to weasel out of it ... then you do the recording double secret probation style.

Probably better to get him to agree to it though.
 

You guys sure love your Husky football! Can't say the same for this Softy dude. Softy? Just how did he get that name? Would a real man want to be call Softy? Soft what? You know what I am saying.
Click to expand...

You might wanna PM 49ers fans on this.
 
I was present for the Rip_Ty (That guy is a dick) and Softy meetings in Vegas. Softy isn't as much of a doog as he is on twitter and the radio. I just wish he would start expecting more from every sport in the area. I think though as a radio personality, and the fact that a lot of people in this area don't like to hold people to standards makes him a lot passive on the radio.

I really believe there is a place for a radio host to ask for more from every aspect of the sports landscape in Seattle, it would be a big change from what you get in this market right now. If Softy was smart he would be that guy, but I don't think he will do it.
 
Yeah it doesn't surprise me that Softy personally wants the coach that will bring us to the top so he can go troll the fuck out of duck and cougar fans, but then has this doog radio personality on air that makes us all want to plunger our ears.
 
Years ago I did call him out face to face and he looked like he wanted to crawl into a hole. This was at Valhalla in Kirkland. Basically called him out for being a BCC guy / homer Doog. That fat fuck won't do shit if you chat face to face.
 
1) I can't think of many people that don't realize that this program is in a better place today than it was when Sark took over - he should be thanked for that. But at the same time, it was also clear that he wasn't the answer going forward to take this program to the next level.
Click to expand...

Fuck that. His thank you was those big ass checks he was cashing. You shouldn't get thanked for doing absolute bare minimum of your job requirements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top