OFFICIAL HARDCORE HUSKY PAC-10 POWER RANKINGS

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.

Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!

Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.

Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.

Ty at Stanford was better than Sark at Washington.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Notre Dame is the epitome of PAC 12 dreckfest. Why isn't this PAC 12 member on the list?

Special invitees to the conference must play two Pac-12 teams to be ranked.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

What happened to Nevada btw?

Got beat at home by Colorado State.

 

[Mad_Son]

I've seen all I need to see.

 

[uzi]

Methodology: Everyone in this conference sucks. I'm ranking the teams by conference points scored divided by conference points allowed because I can't think of any other way to do it. Can't use +/- because of differences in number of games played.

Have you considered normalizing each team's relative points scored and allowed against other teams? Then you could try linear regression and stochastic calculus to produce two rank ordered lists and then average sort them.

 

[dhdawg]

I can't wait for #ourirish to be #1 after their Arizona state plungering

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Methodology: Everyone in this conference sucks. I'm ranking the teams by conference points scored divided by conference points allowed because I can't think of any other way to do it. Can't use +/- because of differences in number of games played.

Have you considered normalizing each team's relative points scored and allowed against other teams? Then you could try linear regression and stochastic calculus to produce two rank ordered lists and then average sort them.

Math Superiority Guy