OFFICIAL HARDCORE HUSKY PAC-10 POWER RANKINGS

TierbsHsotBoobs

TierbsHsotBoobs

New Fish
Methodology: Everyone in this conference sucks. I'm ranking the teams by conference points scored divided by conference points allowed because I can't think of any other way to do it. Can't use +/- because of differences in number of games played.

-------------- fucking dreckfest --------------

1. Washington (44/27 = 1.63)
2. Stanford (64/43 = 1.49)
3. USC (110/84 = 1.31)
4. UCLA (120/99 = 1.21)
5. Oregon (104/92 = 1.13)
6. Arizona (106/97 = 1.09)
7. Utah (57/56 = 1.02)

8. Cal (171/195 = 0.88) -- still way too damn high
9. ASU (103/120 = 0.86)
10. OSU (46/66 = 0.70)
 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.

 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
Click to expand...

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.
 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
Click to expand...

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.
Click to expand...

Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!

Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.
 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
Click to expand...

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.
Click to expand...

Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!

Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.
Click to expand...

Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.
 
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
Click to expand...

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.
Click to expand...

I'll never forget that. Air Farce kicked "our" ass (again) in Seattle. We still damn near won the conference. And Tytanic's Rose Bowl.
 
Last edited:
USC is the best team in the conference right now. Wins over Stanford and UA are the most impressive resume so far.
Click to expand...

If the best team in your conference lost to Boston College, your conference blows.
Click to expand...

That was never in the metric, but always a given. I actually bought into the preseason hype. I thought 10 returning QB's and the addition of Peterman while giving Sark more talent would really raise the ceiling. Instead this is the worst I can ever remember, like 1995 bad when a mediocre Duck team made the Cotton Bowl.
Click to expand...

1999 was the worst ever:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Stanford_Cardinal_football_team

This year isn't that bad.
Click to expand...

Holy fuck, 7-1 conference record with a loss to San Jose State. That is Rich Brooks quality!

Ty actually wasn't that awful at Stanford. Those Indiana Nazis/Catholics fucked him up badly.
Click to expand...

Husky fans tend to remember Ty for 0-12 but the truth is his career suggests he is mediocre like Sark. With slightly more success.
Click to expand...

Sark is Ty. The USC job is the same as Ty at Notre Dame.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top