Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.
Funny how the pretensions the tug had to being anti war evaporated.
Haven't heard, "we shouldn't sell arms to Isreal" or "they brought this on themselves by shelling Gaza" yet. Anyone want to take any of that out for a spin?
I’m cool with the selling of arms to Israel, the free money handouts not so much.
If the US didn't give a dime to either side Israel would win
Rather easily
The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, and Mr. Blinken said that much of the equipment from that funding is already “in the pipeline” to be sent to Israel.
[/i]
Why is the tug ok with sending money to Israel to secure their border instead of securing our own border?
I said nor a dime to either side
Just picking on you guysm that can actually carry a coherent line. Obviously, those who can't see the hypocrisy between stances on Israel and Ukraine never will. No doubt plenty of people on twitter with UKR flags in their profiles disavow Israel. The tug is supposed to be better than H though.
Sure seems we? carry a different tune when it's convenient.
So then who's in for cutting military aid to Israel?
I do agree that our allies *in general*, take for granted US support. That's part of what I liked about Trump. Big swinging dick foreign policy. We're #1 and you are going to treat us that way.