Officer Wilson goes free with no charge

Ã
I believe Obama also said something to the effect of there being distrust and laws being applied in a discriminatory manner.

Last I checked, he's the POTUS. If he sees what he said as a significant problem, then I'd recommend to him that he makes it a priority to make it less of a problem. Otherwise, comments like the ones he made tonight just make those that feel that they are being slighted (rightly or wrongly) more empowered with the belief that their actions are noble and just.

I also saw something somewhere that said that the Ferguson community has a lot of distrust between a community of over 70% African American with a leadership structure in place that is most Caucasian. IF these problems are so severe in place there, then wouldn't it make sense to vote those people out of office?

Who knows what truly happened. It's a tragedy regardless. But it's a sad commentary for America when as a nation that believes in a person's innocence until they are proven guilty that that holds except for when the result isn't what many wanted.
Click to expand...

I think if anyone knows what happened, it's the 12 on the grand jury. At least they know as much as possible and more than everyone else. I found it intesting to hear Obama say that people are "understandably" angry. Why would he think they are understandably angry? That implies they have a reason to be angry which then infers the grand jury was wrong and Wilson should stand trial.
If the grand jury is right,the justice is served, Putting an innocent person on trail to appease a mob is not justice.

But how his he a bad president?
Click to expand...

but what if the Grand Jury got it wrong and the news media, race baiters and white guilt students protesting got it right? Aren't you glad Obama was one step ahead? He ordered Holder conduct a separate federal investigation to ensure justice will be served regardless of the outcome from the grand jury investigation.

 
The coverage by the media was a big reason the prosecution lost the case. Everyone was so desperate to paint the cop guilty, that misinformation was delivered by the media, which the defense used against the prosecution. It also didn't help that many of the witnesses for the prosecution exaggerated the facts or blatantly lied on the stand, which the defense proved. That really doesn't help the prosecution build a strong case.
 
Last edited:
The coverage by the media was a big reason the prosecution lost the case. Everyone was so desperate to paint the cop guilty, that misinformation was delivered by the media, which the defense used against the prosecution. It also didn't help that many of the witnesses for the prosecution exaggerated the facts or blatantly lied on the stand, which the defense proved. That really doesn't help the prosecution build a strong case.
Click to expand...

TL, DR: The physical evidence showed there wasn't a case against Wilson.
 
Passions passive aggressive flagging speaks volumes
Click to expand...

Passion hates facts:

635524965887994011-AP-Ferguson.2.jpg


Assume the fat lip, and the marking on face and neck are all fake.
 
The coverage by the media was a big reason the prosecution lost the case. Everyone was so desperate to paint the cop guilty, that misinformation was delivered by the media, which the defense used against the prosecution. It also didn't help that many of the witnesses for the prosecution exaggerated the facts or blatantly lied on the stand, which the defense proved. That really doesn't help the prosecution build a strong case.
Click to expand...

The defense didn't prove/disprove anything. No defense attorneys are involved in a grand jury proceeding.
 
The coverage by the media was a big reason the prosecution lost the case. Everyone was so desperate to paint the cop guilty, that misinformation was delivered by the media, which the defense used against the prosecution. It also didn't help that many of the witnesses for the prosecution exaggerated the facts or blatantly lied on the stand, which the defense proved. That really doesn't help the prosecution build a strong case.
Click to expand...

The defense didn't prove/disprove anything. No defense attorneys are involved in a grand jury proceeding.
Click to expand...

Grand Jury superiority guy
 
The coverage by the media was a big reason the prosecution lost the case. Everyone was so desperate to paint the cop guilty, that misinformation was delivered by the media, which the defense used against the prosecution. It also didn't help that many of the witnesses for the prosecution exaggerated the facts or blatantly lied on the stand, which the defense proved. That really doesn't help the prosecution build a strong case.
Click to expand...

Yeah... No defense is a Grand Jury makes it very easy to get an indictment. So when there is no indictment, you can be confident the evidence is shit.
 
If it were a white person that was shot, there would have been no Grad Jury. The prosecutor just would have said no evidence of murder and moved on. Barely made the news. Since the person shot was black, it spun out of control and the prosecutor was forced to take it to the next step so there could be no accusation of a cover up or special treatment. The black family received a much more thorough examination of the facts that a white family would have. Everyone should feel confident that justice was served in this case. If you don't, then you are letting prejudice and racism cloud the facts of this case. Throwing an innocent person in prison to appease and angry mob is not justice. As MLK said: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
 
If it were a white person that was shot, there would have been no Grad Jury. The prosecutor just would have said no evidence of murder and moved on. Barely made the news. Since the person shot was black, it spun out of control and the prosecutor was forced to take it to the next step so there could be no accusation of a cover up or special treatment. The black family received a much more thorough examination of the facts that a white family would have. Everyone should feel confident that justice was served in this case. If you don't, then you are letting prejudice and racism cloud the facts of this case. Throwing an innocent person in prison to appease and angry mob is not justice. As MLK said: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
Click to expand...

Passion hates facts:

witnessexcerptmb.jpg
 
From the reports I've read about his wildly aggressive actions, it kind of sounds like Brown smoked real chronic (weed laced with crack or coke) or had his blunt dipped (in PCP or embalming fluid).

Maybe I'm crazy and especially if I'm 6'5" 285 lbs, but I wouldn't expect to strong-arm rob a minimart of Swishers (for my blizzies), disregard and then confront an officer of the law, escalate the situation further by assaulting the officer in his own vehicle, and finally expect to survive it all.

While somewhat off point, Rudy does have a point about this outrage and what the fundamental problem is. If black Americans are responsible for 93% of the deaths of other black Americans, then where are the protests demanding better from their own community? dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2846928/Rudy-Giuliani-wants-focus-black-black-crime-not-police-brutality-saying-white-cops-wouldn-t-needed-weren-t-killing-other.html

This cult of victimization and woe-is-me attitude only perpetuates the underlying problem which is black on black crime. They could make the whole Ferguson police force (or Chicago's) black and it still wouldn't solve any problems.

Of course the jaded part of me thinks losers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson don't want solutions because then they wouldn't be able to raise money to fund their lifestyles as they pretend to actually address the real issues.
 
Passion,

What are your thoughts?
Click to expand...

Are you surprised his liberal white guilt is making his vagina bleed profusely? If so you may need to PM SATANS_FAGGOT IrishDawg22
Click to expand...

That's pretty much happened with my friend and the millions of other guilty white liberals and race baiters. They aren't seeing the facts objectively because they don't want to. I didn't bother responding to the text because a) it wasn't worth dignifying with a response and b) he has a history of throwing hissy fits over things like these.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top