Not sure about this indictment

[AOG]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

 

[Bob_C]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?

 

[AOG]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?

I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?

 

[AOG]

I think this is a tax issue like Al Capone? Maybe the law expense could be written off, but not hush payments. Probably the law expense could be written off, but the hush money would be taxed differently.

 

[jecornel]

All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

 

[Bob_C]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?

I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?

Use your brain a little.

You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.

 

[AOG]

All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

 

[Sledog]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

When the person accusing has denied it happened several times and is suing you for doing it and you have to hire lawyers it's a legal expense.

 

[AOG]

I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?

I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?

Use your brain a little.

You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.

I must have been thinking "injured party" from civil cases, right

 

[Bob_C]

Interesting take.
https://twitter.com/barnes_law/status/1643361279397203968?s=46&t=TF5YSHjB9Hq6ZBrenucnTg

 

[pawz]

All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once[/i][/b]... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

I cackled IRL like an idiot hyena.

 

[jecornel]

 

[AOG]

I found this: "The key legal question in the case was always how the district attorney would take the charge of falsifying business records — a misdemeanor[/i][/b] — and make a felony of it. The statement of facts suggests that the second crime here that would trigger a felony charge is a violation of election law."

This is why it seems more like a misdemeanor to me. It is, except for the prosecution's novel idea to make it felony due to election. I don't like this strategy.

 

[HHusky]

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

 

[MelloDawg]

All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

Sounds like a rough day for you.

 

[Bob_C]

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

 

[Pitchfork51]

Lol when this all gets downgraded to misdemeanors and like a fine the Dems might literally kill Bragg

 

[AOG]

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

I think it was what they got Cohen for, invalid campaign contribution???

 

[HHusky]

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

See,[/i] John Edwards.

 

[AOG]

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

is this linked to NY state law?