Genuinely curious, why isn't Lanning paid more? He's regularly rated as high as the third best coaches by reputable outlets like On3, 35-6, Big 10 champion, endless TBS accolades and he's behind guys like Drinkwitz and the wrong Stoops and only .5 mil ahead of Jedd, which is pretty funny. Is the Phil Nike stock true? Is he just so genuinely committed to the program he doesn't need more?
Last edited by a moderator: