NOAA Cheated With Global Warming Data
- Thread starter d2d
- Start date
2001400ex
New Fish
Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming “hiatus.”
From your article. For fucks sakes. 1998 was way fucking warmer than any year prior. There was a huge spike in temperatures that year, then now there is a "hiatus" because the trend of that singular year didn't continue. However, every year since then has been almost as hot or hotter. So the last 18 years is much hotter than the 18 before yet. How the fuck can you read that and think global warming is on hiatus? Sarcastic or not, you are FS.
From your article. For fucks sakes. 1998 was way fucking warmer than any year prior. There was a huge spike in temperatures that year, then now there is a "hiatus" because the trend of that singular year didn't continue. However, every year since then has been almost as hot or hotter. So the last 18 years is much hotter than the 18 before yet. How the fuck can you read that and think global warming is on hiatus? Sarcastic or not, you are FS.
Last edited:
sarktastic
New Fish
(pssssst.... you forgot to wipe your chin)
Remember when Asbestos and cigarette manufacturers spent a lot of money and even hired scientists and funded thinktanks to cloud and distort public perception of the harmful affects of their products? That's what's happening here.
sarktastic
New Fish
It's sad to see how far the used honda has fallen.
d2d
New Fish
It's a vast right wing conspiracy...
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
reason.com/blog/2014/06/23/did-nasanoaa-dramatically-alter-us-tempe
forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/
thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17500-u-s-agencies-accused-of-fudging-data-to-show-global-warming
Honda loves Gallup, right? I thought the science was settled... Only 39% agree with you? 25% agree with me? SHOCKING !!!
GALLUP:
Debating with Honda is like having a gunfight with an unarmed child.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
reason.com/blog/2014/06/23/did-nasanoaa-dramatically-alter-us-tempe
forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/
thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17500-u-s-agencies-accused-of-fudging-data-to-show-global-warming
Honda loves Gallup, right? I thought the science was settled... Only 39% agree with you? 25% agree with me? SHOCKING !!!
GALLUP:
One in Four in U.S. Are Solidly Skeptical of Global Warming
PRINCETON, NJ -- Over the past decade, Americans have clustered into three broad groups on global warming. The largest, currently describing 39% of U.S. adults, are what can be termed "Concerned Believers" -- those who attribute global warming to human actions and are worried about it. This is followed by the "Mixed Middle," at 36%. And one in four Americans -- the "Cool Skeptics" -- are not worried about global warming much or at all.
Debating with Honda is like having a gunfight with an unarmed child.
Last edited:
AZDuck
New Fish
2001400ex
New Fish
It's a vast right wing conspiracy...
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
reason.com/blog/2014/06/23/did-nasanoaa-dramatically-alter-us-tempe
forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/
thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17500-u-s-agencies-accused-of-fudging-data-to-show-global-warming
Honda loves Gallup, right? I thought the science was settled... Only 39% agree with you? 25% agree with me? SHOCKING !!!
GALLUP:
One in Four in U.S. Are Solidly Skeptical of Global Warming
PRINCETON, NJ -- Over the past decade, Americans have clustered into three broad groups on global warming. The largest, currently describing 39% of U.S. adults, are what can be termed "Concerned Believers" -- those who attribute global warming to human actions and are worried about it. This is followed by the "Mixed Middle," at 36%. And one in four Americans -- the "Cool Skeptics" -- are not worried about global warming much or at all.
Debating with Honda is like having a gunfight with an unarmed child.
Learn how to read a poll. You can't even read it when it's in picture form.
But those right wing conspiracy websites add to your argument.
HoustonHusky
New Fish
Statistics called and said you are one of the biggest fucking morons walking the planet. But don't let reality get in the way of making a point, not matter how FS it is. And yes, modern record...i.e. when satellites started taking data...huge long-term dataset there.
Lets be honest here...M&M tore apart Mann's fake science in a mathematical way that was the equivalent of Tyson's knockout of Marvis Frazier, and it was done it a way you simply don't have the ability to comprehend. So excuse me if I laugh at you (of all people) attempting to blast him.
You can sit here and try and justify every three years a new article coming out further lowering historical temperature data to try and make the current temperatures appear drastic, but at the end of the day its a) joke "science", and b) it still doesn't explain why, if true, the temperatures now are statistically outside (lower) than all of the climate model predictions. The correlation with CO2 falls apart.
Ignore 1998 if you want to and look at everything past it...
It hasn't warmed, even through CO2 levels have gone from 365ppm to 400ppm, a larger rate in the rise in CO2 levels than anything in the recent past. You can't say a causes b, and then ignore the last X number of years when a has gone up faster than before and b hasn't budged and inch. Well, you can, but its pretty FS...something you seem to be an expert at.
Now go run along and this time listen to the driver of the short bus when he tells you not to eat the gum stuck to the bottom of the seat in front of you.
Lets be honest here...M&M tore apart Mann's fake science in a mathematical way that was the equivalent of Tyson's knockout of Marvis Frazier, and it was done it a way you simply don't have the ability to comprehend. So excuse me if I laugh at you (of all people) attempting to blast him.
You can sit here and try and justify every three years a new article coming out further lowering historical temperature data to try and make the current temperatures appear drastic, but at the end of the day its a) joke "science", and b) it still doesn't explain why, if true, the temperatures now are statistically outside (lower) than all of the climate model predictions. The correlation with CO2 falls apart.
Ignore 1998 if you want to and look at everything past it...
It hasn't warmed, even through CO2 levels have gone from 365ppm to 400ppm, a larger rate in the rise in CO2 levels than anything in the recent past. You can't say a causes b, and then ignore the last X number of years when a has gone up faster than before and b hasn't budged and inch. Well, you can, but its pretty FS...something you seem to be an expert at.
Now go run along and this time listen to the driver of the short bus when he tells you not to eat the gum stuck to the bottom of the seat in front of you.
2001400ex
New Fish
Statistics called and said you are one of the biggest fucking morons walking the planet. But don't let reality get in the way of making a point, not matter how FS it is. And yes, modern record...i.e. when satellites started taking data...huge long-term dataset there.
Lets be honest here...M&M tore apart Mann's fake science in a mathematical way that was the equivalent of Tyson's knockout of Marvis Frazier, and it was done it a way you simply don't have the ability to comprehend. So excuse me if I laugh at you (of all people) attempting to blast him.
You can sit here and try and justify every three years a new article coming out further lowering historical temperature data to try and make the current temperatures appear drastic, but at the end of the day its a) joke "science", and b) it still doesn't explain why, if true, the temperatures now are statistically outside (lower) than all of the climate model predictions. The correlation with CO2 falls apart.
Ignore 1998 if you want to and look at everything past it...
It hasn't warmed, even through CO2 levels have gone from 365ppm to 400ppm, a larger rate in the rise in CO2 levels than anything in the recent past. You can't say a causes b, and then ignore the last X number of years when a has gone up faster than before and b hasn't budged and inch. Well, you can, but its pretty FS...something you seem to be an expert at.
Now go run along and this time listen to the driver of the short bus when he tells you not to eat the gum stuck to the bottom of the seat in front of you.
Show me one time I've said for sure that humans have caused warming. The earth is the warmest it's been in recorded history the last 17 years. That's a fact that even your charts say.
But yes call me stupid. It adds to your argument.
HoustonHusky
New Fish
16 years...as you said 17 years ago it was hotter. "Recorded" Being the key word...a much smaller timeframe than you would admit. And yes, you just keep quoting and linking and quoting from the "skepticalscience" website for fun...FS...
HuskyInAZ
New Fish
It's a vast right wing conspiracy...
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
breitbart.com/london/2014/06/23/global-warming-fabricated-by-nasa-and-noaa/
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
reason.com/blog/2014/06/23/did-nasanoaa-dramatically-alter-us-tempe
forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/
thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/17500-u-s-agencies-accused-of-fudging-data-to-show-global-warming
Honda loves Gallup, right? I thought the science was settled... Only 39% agree with you? 25% agree with me? SHOCKING !!!
GALLUP:
One in Four in U.S. Are Solidly Skeptical of Global Warming
PRINCETON, NJ -- Over the past decade, Americans have clustered into three broad groups on global warming. The largest, currently describing 39% of U.S. adults, are what can be termed "Concerned Believers" -- those who attribute global warming to human actions and are worried about it. This is followed by the "Mixed Middle," at 36%. And one in four Americans -- the "Cool Skeptics" -- are not worried about global warming much or at all.
Debating with Honda is like having a gunfight with an unarmed child.
I don't disagree with the point you are trying to make. But to throw out 6 links in a single post and expect anyone on this bored to read them is beyond FS. It makes @Tequilla's former dissertations look downright concise.
unfrozencaveman
New Fish
What a bunch of nonsense - the good folks in the Pac NW need to spend less time worrying about climate change and a little more time preparing for the 9.0 mega-quake along the Cascadia subduction zone. It's coming
2001400ex
New Fish
I've linked to skeptical science once. I have also linked to wiki that shows that around 90% of the scientists across the world that study this for a living, think humans are at least partially responsible. And death has linked to a daily caller article that showed that about 75% off the meteorologists think humans are at least partially responsible for global warming.
But keep thinking we are in a cooling period. I'm sure you and death are much smarter than those people that study this for a living.
