No Combine Invite for Jaydon

There is still hope for important 5'4" players

169852766-sportsman-of-the-year-notre-dame-head-coach-gettyimages.jpg
 
99% of yous praised Sark for his recruiting, then whined like wives because they finished last in offense In the pac12, but this year due to Peter's recruiting, crawled out the cellar (with the 2 guys puppy said would both star as true freshmen (gaskin, browning).

"It was Petersen's fault, j smiths fault." Well Jay don makes clear the issue left behind by Sark and facing Petersen. FCS roster. "But hey , Petersen should have won 10 games last year". "Hey Sark left Petersen with a couple decent NFL players on defense and cyler miles". "Petersen cant coach at this level".

Aside from Bill, Road and I, everyone here pounded, jim foreman style, the above sentiments on a painfully consistent basis.

Jaydon was always an inch away from making the big catch, an inch away from a 1st down, or a dropped td pass away from a victory. No surprise...he's quick not fast, and he cant catch. Translation...dead meat on an NFL field.

Difference between him and lockett? Lockett was good at SOMETHING!.
Click to expand...

I don't like Smith, but the team had a lot of freshman and it's funny how they got better with experience.
 
Just wanted to point out (if it hasn't been already) that while Mickens is #2 all time in receptions, he's not even in the top 40 all time in average yards per catch. That makes him one of the all-time leaders in 'wasting a down'.

Oh, and his 12 career TDs don't look very good when you consider that his 235 total snaps ranks #2 all time for a WR. For some perspective, Devin Aguilar only played 136 snaps but caught 13 TD passes in his career. IIRC, nobody gave a shit that he didn't get invited to the combine. Even Sonny Shackelford accumulated 10 TDs with over 100 less snaps than Mickens.

And all it took to expose him was a single trip tohttp://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/receiving.html

I should really add "Excellent at Mickens bashing" to my resume.
 
99% of yous praised Sark for his recruiting, then whined like wives because they finished last in offense In the pac12, but this year due to Peter's recruiting, crawled out the cellar (with the 2 guys puppy said would both star as true freshmen (gaskin, browning).

"It was Petersen's fault, j smiths fault." Well Jay don makes clear the issue left behind by Sark and facing Petersen. FCS roster. "But hey , Petersen should have won 10 games last year". "Hey Sark left Petersen with a couple decent NFL players on defense and cyler miles". "Petersen cant coach at this level".

Aside from Bill, Road and I, everyone here pounded, jim foreman style, the above sentiments on a painfully consistent basis.

Jaydon was always an inch away from making the big catch, an inch away from a 1st down, or a dropped td pass away from a victory. No surprise...he's quick not fast, and he cant catch. Translation...dead meat on an NFL field.

Difference between him and lockett? Lockett was good at SOMETHING!.
Click to expand...
When is Peterman gonna have a winning conference record?
 
It's interesting when you look at that list, who has the words yards/catch in the history of UW WRs; of people with 100 yards or more in their career (in order from shittiest to least shitty) these are the shittiest WRs in UW history:

1. Kendyl Taylor (8.0ypc)
2. Willie Rosborough (9.4ypc)
3. Eddie Jackson (9.5ypc)
4. DiAndre Campbell (9.8ypc)
5. Damon Barry (9.8ypc)
6. Cody Bruns (10.7ypc)
7. Curtis Gaspard (10.7ypc)
8. Joe Jarzynka (10.8ypc)
9. Jaydon Mickens (10.8ypc)
10. Damon Mack (10.9ypc)

The only WR on this list with over 500 career yards is Jaydon.

The next 500 yard+ guy is Dane Looker (11.3).

The next WR on the list with over 1,000 career yards is Kasen Williams (11.8ypc).

The next guy with 2,000+ is Reggie Williams at 14.9ypc.

If you're wondering who our BEST big play guys ever (1,000+ career yards) were they are:

1. Tom Scott (24.0ypc)
2. Spider Gaines (23.2ypc)
3. Brian Slater (19.4ypc)
4. Andre Riley (19.3ypc)

Guys that just missed because they were under 1,000 yards:

Craig Chambers (981yds; 19.6ypc)
Andre DeSaussure (837yds; 19.5ypc)
 
Just wanted to point out (if it hasn't been already) that while Mickens is #2 all time in receptions, he's not even in the top 40 all time in average yards per catch. That makes him one of the all-time leaders in 'wasting a down'.

Oh, and his 12 career TDs don't look very good when you consider that his 235 total snaps ranks #2 all time for a WR. For some perspective, Devin Aguilar only played 136 snaps but caught 13 TD passes in his career. IIRC, nobody gave a shit that he didn't get invited to the combine. Even Sonny Shackelford accumulated 10 TDs with over 100 less snaps than Mickens.

And all it took to expose him was a single trip tohttp://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/receiving.html

I should really add "Excellent at Mickens bashing" to my resume.
Click to expand...

Snaps? I think you mean touches.
 
Just wanted to point out (if it hasn't been already) that while Mickens is #2 all time in receptions, he's not even in the top 40 all time in average yards per catch. That makes him one of the all-time leaders in 'wasting a down'.

Oh, and his 12 career TDs don't look very good when you consider that his 235 total snaps ranks #2 all time for a WR. For some perspective, Devin Aguilar only played 136 snaps but caught 13 TD passes in his career. IIRC, nobody gave a shit that he didn't get invited to the combine. Even Sonny Shackelford accumulated 10 TDs with over 100 less snaps than Mickens.

And all it took to expose him was a single trip tohttp://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/receiving.html

I should really add "Excellent at Mickens bashing" to my resume.
Click to expand...

Snaps? I think you mean touches.
Click to expand...

Scrimmage > Plays. I translated that as snaps. If it actually means touches then that's a garbage way to label it.
 
Just wanted to point out (if it hasn't been already) that while Mickens is #2 all time in receptions, he's not even in the top 40 all time in average yards per catch. That makes him one of the all-time leaders in 'wasting a down'.

Oh, and his 12 career TDs don't look very good when you consider that his 235 total snaps ranks #2 all time for a WR. For some perspective, Devin Aguilar only played 136 snaps but caught 13 TD passes in his career. IIRC, nobody gave a shit that he didn't get invited to the combine. Even Sonny Shackelford accumulated 10 TDs with over 100 less snaps than Mickens.

And all it took to expose him was a single trip tohttp://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/receiving.html

I should really add "Excellent at Mickens bashing" to my resume.
Click to expand...

Snaps? I think you mean touches.
Click to expand...

Scrimmage > Plays. I translated that as snaps. If it actually means touches then that's a garbage way to label it.
Click to expand...

Add up the receptions + rushes.

Do you really think Jaydon only played 235 snaps for UW in four years? You must be better at alcoholism than I am.
 
Just wanted to point out (if it hasn't been already) that while Mickens is #2 all time in receptions, he's not even in the top 40 all time in average yards per catch. That makes him one of the all-time leaders in 'wasting a down'.

Oh, and his 12 career TDs don't look very good when you consider that his 235 total snaps ranks #2 all time for a WR. For some perspective, Devin Aguilar only played 136 snaps but caught 13 TD passes in his career. IIRC, nobody gave a shit that he didn't get invited to the combine. Even Sonny Shackelford accumulated 10 TDs with over 100 less snaps than Mickens.

And all it took to expose him was a single trip tohttp://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/receiving.html

I should really add "Excellent at Mickens bashing" to my resume.
Click to expand...

Snaps? I think you mean touches.
Click to expand...

Scrimmage > Plays. I translated that as snaps. If it actually means touches then that's a garbage way to label it.
Click to expand...

Add up the receptions + rushes.

Do you really think Jaydon only played 235 snaps for UW in four years? You must be better at alcoholism than I am.
Click to expand...

When I think of our offense the last few years, I pictured going 3 and out a lot, so 200 or so total snaps seemed about right for a starter.

But you're completely right, especially about the alcoholism.

 
Last edited:
The script says, even though he's a huge POS, we will miss him next year because we don't have much behind him (see Exhibit A: Miley Cylars)
 
99% of yous praised Sark for his recruiting, then whined like wives because they finished last in offense In the pac12, but this year due to Peter's recruiting, crawled out the cellar (with the 2 guys puppy said would both star as true freshmen (gaskin, browning).

"It was Petersen's fault, j smiths fault." Well Jay don makes clear the issue left behind by Sark and facing Petersen. FCS roster. "But hey , Petersen should have won 10 games last year". "Hey Sark left Petersen with a couple decent NFL players on defense and cyler miles". "Petersen cant coach at this level".

Aside from Bill, Road and I, everyone here pounded, jim foreman style, the above sentiments on a painfully consistent basis.

Jaydon was always an inch away from making the big catch, an inch away from a 1st down, or a dropped td pass away from a victory. No surprise...he's quick not fast, and he cant catch. Translation...dead meat on an NFL field.

Difference between him and lockett? Lockett was good at SOMETHING!.
Click to expand...
When is Peterman gonna have a winning conference record?
Click to expand...

Such fag J. For 20th time. It takes 4-5 years to turn a team around from sanctions. Sark sanctions. We were way better off when Lambo took over a team with 20 less scholarships, no bowl games for 2 years. Lambo had an oline with 1st round NFL talent and 2 nfl qb's on his roster.

Petersen had borderline fcs olinemen and high-school qb talent. See the difference futtfuck? Its easy to spit out clueless generalities, SEC expectations like you do J. In reality it just supports the obvious, that you dont understand the game, that you belong over on dawgman with your retarded brethren.

Petersen will have a winning conference record when HIS players gather experience. Most likely next year, a year early, as it generally takes 4-5 years to turn a team off sanctions into a bonerfide contender. I told your dumbass 2 years ago to be patient. Of course you couldnt, as most armchair dipshits cant, and you bring the same tired inaccuracies and stupidity to the bored every day.

At least Tommy realized he was out of his league at HH, and generally just lurkes in read-only mode. You however keep posting, keep embarrassing yourself daily. Just shut the fuck up and let the big boys handle the upper-level discussion. Keep quiet until called upon or until you learn a little about the game.
 
99% of yous praised Sark for his recruiting, then whined like wives because they finished last in offense In the pac12, but this year due to Peter's recruiting, crawled out the cellar (with the 2 guys puppy said would both star as true freshmen (gaskin, browning).

"It was Petersen's fault, j smiths fault." Well Jay don makes clear the issue left behind by Sark and facing Petersen. FCS roster. "But hey , Petersen should have won 10 games last year". "Hey Sark left Petersen with a couple decent NFL players on defense and cyler miles". "Petersen cant coach at this level".

Aside from Bill, Road and I, everyone here pounded, jim foreman style, the above sentiments on a painfully consistent basis.

Jaydon was always an inch away from making the big catch, an inch away from a 1st down, or a dropped td pass away from a victory. No surprise...he's quick not fast, and he cant catch. Translation...dead meat on an NFL field.

Difference between him and lockett? Lockett was good at SOMETHING!.
Click to expand...
When is Peterman gonna have a winning conference record?
Click to expand...

Such fag J. For 20th time. It takes 4-5 years to turn a team around from sanctions. Sark sanctions. We were way better off when Lambo took over a team with 20 less scholarships, no bowl games for 2 years. Lambo had an oline with 1st round NFL talent and 2 nfl qb's on his roster.

Petersen had borderline fcs olinemen and high-school qb talent. See the difference futtfuck? Its easy to spit out clueless generalities, SEC expectations like you do J. In reality it just supports the obvious, that you dont understand the game, that you belong over on dawgman with your retarded brethren.

Petersen will have a winning conference record when HIS players gather experience. Most likely next year, a year early, as it generally takes 4-5 years to turn a team off sanctions into a bonerfide contender. I told your dumbass 2 years ago to be patient. Of course you couldnt, as most armchair dipshits cant, and you bring the same tired inaccuracies and stupidity to the bored every day.

At least Tommy realized he was out of his league at HH, and generally just lurkes in read-only mode. You however keep posting, keep embarrassing yourself daily. Just shut the fuck up and let the big boys handle the upper-level discussion. Keep quiet until called upon or until you learn a little about the game.
Click to expand...

FREE PUB!!1!

It bothers me that you are really this stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top