New Husky Fan Podcast Episode

[SonnyShackelford]

nobody's ever thrown a shout out to me because you guys don't dig the Asian girls. I'm okay with it - less competition for me.

I, for one, miss your weekends in review. One of my favorite parts of the season. #fanboy #$5wineoftheweek

 

[jecornel]

Have I ever got a shout out? #Drunk

A number of them...plus a two dads line from chest.

 

[KoolAidMan]

Just wanted to chime in and say great podcast. Finally got around to listening to it and it's nice to hear football talk during the offseason. Keep up the good work. Enjoyed the worst local news guy stuff lol. Not sure why anyone goes to Doogman when you have the podcast and the boards here.

 

[LaZoris]

"He was a coin flip away"

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Definitely one of ybe and I've listened to 90% of your podcasts since July of 2013.

Of course I am drunk off Jack and Jack n Cokes.. Cracked up at the end after the death2duck and puppy comments

 

[beelzebub]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

 

[RoadDawg55]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Did Mike Leach tell you this?

 

[HuskyInAZ]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

 

[beelzebub]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

 

[haie]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

 

[beelzebub]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?

 

[haie]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?

The best players from your home state (I'd argue Washington is a better state for football than in the James era, but that is just me), along with some 4*'s from California, supplemented by under-the-radar kids from that same state you can develop into great contributors. I believe that is the formula they're going for, and I don't see why that can't work out.

This way you're creating a mentality that if you grow up in Washington, you should play for a Washington school and defend the turf, so to speak. It keeps kids from playing for your out-of-state rivals. Then there are plenty of athletes from California to round out your roster from there. Relying almost entirely on Cali kids, if that's your point, has already been exhibited here, albeit without coaches who could develop players properly.

 

[Cuogar_Gold]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?

Leach is trying to do the same thing as Petersen, except insert more Texas kids than California kids. The only other difference is that he's not landing the WA kids. Pulling out the upset in HS last year would have helped towards that, but losing that game and then getting plungered this year was bad for "us".

 

[HuskyInAZ]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?

UW's current roster has 31 players from WA out of a total of 101. 2015 recruiting had 8 WA commits out of 24. Why do you poast about shit that you know absolutely nothing about?

And why the fuck do you care whether or not UW recruits in-state or out-of-state. You should focus on the idiot head coach of yours, his shitty recruiting and your team's performance on the field. You know, 3-9.

 

[RoadDawg55]

Lock down the state, fill up with guys from Cali. Same philosophy as ever. Petersen also seems to take a guy or two from the Idaho, Montana, Wyoming so far which makes sense given the connections made while at Boise.

 

[chuck]

Beezlebub isn't being quite as cunty in this thread as others. Must have gotten a handjob at YMCA locker room last night.

Washington produces a fair amount of Pac 12 quality players, and even a fair amount of Pac 12 star players. UW has no built in advantage with the guys in California, Oregon, or anywhere else. They only have that in Washington. USC, UCLA, and even Cal make use of their geographic advantage in recruiting. The core of all of their classes is from their core geographic area. It has to be the same for Washington.

Look what happens when you lose that. Jonathon Stewart left the state at a time when we had shit for running backs. Josh Garnett, Walker Williams, and Zach Banner left at a time when we had shit offensive linemen (remember Steve Schilling...good example of the same). Keivarre (however the fuck you spell it) Russell left and was a freshman starter at Notre Dame. Think he might have helped the UW secondary last year?

When your state produces talent you have to reel them in at a high rate, until such time as you turn into Oregon. Otherwise your roster starts to look like Oregon State's (or WSU's...or UW's). I don't think UW is going to turn into Oregon...ever.

 

[RoadDawg55]

To say the in state guys are not important is incredibly FS. I think we signed six 4 star players from the state (Gaskin, Joyner, Potoae, Adams, Roberts, and McClatcher). Without those guys, the class sucks.

 

[beelzebub]

Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.

Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......

Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.

For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.

This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.

Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?

Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?

UW's current roster has 31 players from WA out of a total of 101. 2015 recruiting had 8 WA commits out of 24. Why do you poast about shit that you know absolutely nothing about?

And why the fuck do you care whether or not UW recruits in-state or out-of-state. You should focus on the idiot head coach of yours, his shitty recruiting and your team's performance on the field. You know, 3-9.

U proved my point u can't win totally relying on Washington kids, ur own numbers show only 30 percent of roster is local, about 6 a year based on 5 year cycle.u have to recruit the hell out of Cali and supplement with state kids.

 

[beelzebub]

To say the in state guys are not important is incredibly FS. I think we signed six 4 star players from the state (Gaskin, Joyner, Potoae, Adams, Roberts, and McClatcher). Without those guys, the class sucks.

No one is saying they aren't important, I wouldn't say ur class sucks (ur words)without local kids but would say and have said it does come up short.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Great pod, not just because my long awaited shout-out, but mostly.