Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.
They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.
Overkill.
They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.
Overkill.
UCLA, UW and SC were consistently the most aggressive non-Conf schedulers around, then Sark happened. Only SC, ND and UCLA have never played a FCS team. I believe UW was the 4th team until very recently.They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.
Overkill.
Sounds like UW 10 years ago. Beware 0-12
False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.
False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.
Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.
Abundance, perhaps?
Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.
Abundance, perhaps?
Butthurt...about what exactly? Even Race knows Puppy and I (and sort of Roaddawg) were right. I piss off the same four or five people off continually "professor"
Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.
Abundance, perhaps?
Butthurt...about what exactly? Even Race knows Puppy and I (and sort of Roaddawg) were right. I piss off the same four or five people off continually "professor"
False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.
Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).
Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.
Baylor was a dumb example by dingleberry. They played the softest non-conference schedule and they don't have a conference title game.False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.
Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).
Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I could also make the argument that Baylor's planned soft schedule would have gotten them in the Playoff if they had just beaten West Virginia.
Baylor was a dumb example by dingleberry. They played the softest non-conference schedule and they don't have a conference title game.False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.
It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.
I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.
Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).
Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I could also make the argument that Baylor's planned soft schedule would have gotten them in the Playoff if they had just beaten West Virginia.