Need To Get The BCR up

Realistically for UW not sure it's a huge matter. In the CFP era, really only Alabama, Clemson, Georgia, LSU, and Ohio State feel like the teams that have the talent to win and even Clemson and LSU have had to have generational QBs to do it and Ohio State only got one in kind of an odd year (Mississippi State was #1 in the nation at one point). Sure, I want Washington to have the highest BCR possible, but I think any remote NC potential stems on having a TCU like season and getting into the final and winning a game with better QB play or scheme.
 
Does the BCR even matter anymore given the impact of the portal?
Click to expand...

That's a good point considering a player may be a 3-star recruit but then essentially be a blue chip transfer.
 
That graphic makes a pretty compelling case for coaching/scheme/evaluation being the number one thing. But I'll defer to the slobbering TBS retards that look the other way when ND barely goes 1/1 against the bay schools at home. It's all about the Jimmy's and Goe's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
When it goes to 12 teams, it's going to be even harder to scheme/eval/out coach 3 or 4 teams to win NC that have more talent.

Your talking teams that will be on game 15/16 and by then depth will definitely be a factor in it.
 
When it goes to 12 teams, it's going to be even harder to scheme/eval/out coach 3 or 4 teams to win NC that have more talent.

Your talking teams that will be on game 15/16 and by then depth will definitely be a factor in it.
Click to expand...

Nah.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top