d2d
New Fish
NASA has updated its data from satellite readings, revealing that the planet’s polar ice caps have not retreated significantly since 1979, when measurements began.
truthandaction.org/nasa-polar-ice-hasnt-receded-since-1979/2/
NASA: Polar Ice Hasn’t Receded Since 1979
- Thread starter d2d
- Start date
NASA has updated its data from satellite readings, revealing that the planet’s polar ice caps have not retreated significantly since 1979, when measurements began.
truthandaction.org/nasa-polar-ice-hasnt-receded-since-1979/2/
2001400ex
New Fish
http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2256/
The sea ice cap of the Arctic appeared to reach its annual maximum winter extent on Feb. 25, according to data from the NASA-supported National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) at the University of Colorado, Boulder. At 5.61 million square miles (14.54 million square kilometers), this year’s maximum extent was the smallest on the satellite record and also one of the earliest.
http://m.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/PolarIce/polar_ice2.php
https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum
Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s. The upward trend in the Antarctic, however, is only about a third of the magnitude of the rapid loss of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean.
HTH
The sea ice cap of the Arctic appeared to reach its annual maximum winter extent on Feb. 25, according to data from the NASA-supported National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) at the University of Colorado, Boulder. At 5.61 million square miles (14.54 million square kilometers), this year’s maximum extent was the smallest on the satellite record and also one of the earliest.
http://m.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/PolarIce/polar_ice2.php
https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum
Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s. The upward trend in the Antarctic, however, is only about a third of the magnitude of the rapid loss of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean.
HTH
doogsinparadise
New Fish
HoustonHusky
New Fish
I like to argue changes of 0.18% (on a measure accuracy of I'm sure something like +/-5% )constitute a crisis and proof of the world ending in 20 years. Especially with ice expanding in both the Arctic and Antarctic and retreating in the Arctic and Antarctic depending on the location.
To put the data (and including the most recent data) in perspective...
(also note the most recent data has the overall Global Total Sea Ice Coverage 13-month trailing average over the historical 25 year average...so HondoFS GFY).
(I love this picture...effin funny).
To put the data (and including the most recent data) in perspective...
(also note the most recent data has the overall Global Total Sea Ice Coverage 13-month trailing average over the historical 25 year average...so HondoFS GFY).
(I love this picture...effin funny).
Hippopeteamus
New Fish
Only if you are into that sort of thing
2001400ex
New Fish
I like to argue changes of 0.18% (on a measure accuracy of I'm sure something like +/-5% )constitute a crisis and proof of the world ending in 20 years. Especially with ice expanding in both the Arctic and Antarctic and retreating in the Arctic and Antarctic depending on the location.
To put the data (and including the most recent data) in perspective...
(also note the most recent data has the overall Global Total Sea Ice Coverage 13-month trailing average over the historical 25 year average...so HondoFS GFY).
(I love this picture...effin funny).
Fuck you are stupid. Keep listening to your masters. They know more than scientists do. And we all know big business and politicians have our best interests in mind.
Politicians are pushing the scam
HTH
HTH
Seems like you do
Now it's a chance?
HoustonHusky
New Fish
I like to argue changes of 0.18% (on a measure accuracy of I'm sure something like +/-5% )constitute a crisis and proof of the world ending in 20 years. Especially with ice expanding in both the Arctic and Antarctic and retreating in the Arctic and Antarctic depending on the location.
To put the data (and including the most recent data) in perspective...
(also note the most recent data has the overall Global Total Sea Ice Coverage 13-month trailing average over the historical 25 year average...so HondoFS GFY).
(I love this picture...effin funny).
Fuck you are stupid. Keep listening to your masters. They know more than scientists do. And we all know big business and politicians have our best interests in mind.
I'm the only one posting data (and not articles/commentary), and your are still to dumb to figure that out. And having been a scientist its FS to think they are independent of biases, especially when their funding depends on it. Heck, there was an article today that came out saying the last two cool summers caused the large increase in Artic ice (as seen in the data I showed), but instead of leaving it there they start predicting the future on how it won't last. Is FS, and is anything but science. The Scientific Method has been shat on by climate scientists (and by you, although you are too clueless to realize it)...the entire concept of a null hypothesis is foreign to them.
Look at the actual data and think for yourself. Or...lets be honest...in your case, look at the data, listen to the crickets in your head, get off your kneepads and check the latest talking points, and then come here and demonstrate your (lack of) IQ.
Either one works for me.
2001400ex
New Fish
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record
Is that not factual?
Death posted about NASA data, then I post the actual data from NASA that shows his news source lied.
Fuck you are dumb.
Is that not factual?
Death posted about NASA data, then I post the actual data from NASA that shows his news source lied.
Fuck you are dumb.
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
HoustonHusky
New Fish
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record
Is that not factual?
Death posted about NASA data, then I post the actual data from NASA that shows his news source lied.
Fuck you are dumb.
No, you didn't. You posted an article that talked about a single data point that is meaningless when applied to the overall picture...I posted the entire data series (Global Ice Coverage) which shows you are full of crap.
And your latest link yet again shows you are a moron. In a feeble attempt to distract from your ice blunders are you now blaming the run-up in temperatures in the first half of the century on CO2? I wouldn't try to match that to data if I were you. Well, lets be honest...reality never does stop you from making a point. Match away...