NASA: Polar Ice Hasn’t Receded Since 1979

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record



Is that not factual?

Death posted about NASA data, then I post the actual data from NASA that shows his news source lied.

Fuck you are dumb.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't. You posted an article that talked about a single data point that is meaningless when applied to the overall picture...I posted the entire data series (Global Ice Coverage) which shows you are full of crap.

And your latest link yet again shows you are a moron. In a feeble attempt to distract from your ice blunders are you now blaming the run-up in temperatures in the first half of the century on CO2? I wouldn't try to match that to data if I were you. Well, lets be honest...reality never does stop you from making a point. Match away...
Click to expand...

Try reading my posts for comprehension. Maybe you'll have a clue. But here's a hint. I've never said global warming is human caused. You see, I'm not a scientist. The facts I know is the earth is warmer, and the majority of scientists think humans are at least partially responsible.

But keep gurgling to big business and politicians who are paid by big business.
 
I like to argue changes of 0.18% (on a measure accuracy of I'm sure something like +/-5% )constitute a crisis and proof of the world ending in 20 years. Especially with ice expanding in both the Arctic and Antarctic and retreating in the Arctic and Antarctic depending on the location.

To put the data (and including the most recent data) in perspective...

NSIDC%20GlobalArcticAntarctic%20SeaIceArea.gif


(also note the most recent data has the overall Global Total Sea Ice Coverage 13-month trailing average over the historical 25 year average...so HondoFS GFY).

image002.jpg

(I love this picture...effin funny).
Click to expand...

Fuck you are stupid. Keep listening to your masters. They know more than scientists do. And we all know big business and politicians have our best interests in mind.
Click to expand...

I'm the only one posting data (and not articles/commentary), and your are still to dumb to figure that out. And having been a scientist its FS to think they are independent of biases, especially when their funding depends on it. Heck, there was an article today that came out saying the last two cool summers caused the large increase in Artic ice (as seen in the data I showed), but instead of leaving it there they start predicting the future on how it won't last. Is FS, and is anything but science. The Scientific Method has been shat on by climate scientists (and by you, although you are too clueless to realize it)...the entire concept of a null hypothesis is foreign to them.

Look at the actual data and think for yourself. Or...lets be honest...in your case, look at the data, listen to the crickets in your head, get off your kneepads and check the latest talking points, and then come here and demonstrate your (lack of) IQ.

Either one works for me.
Click to expand...

Watch out. AZFuck will ask for your SSN to prove you used to be a scientist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top