Name calling of recruits

DerekJohnson

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
We have few rules here and it takes a lot to get the boot. But we now have a new rule. We will no longer allow name calling of underage recruits. It's wrong on many levels. I'm sure most of us can agree that it serves no purpose toward Husky Football or this site. Thank you.
 
We only have like 4 rules here. Half of them are as a result of PL_SS. WTF?
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
Click to expand...

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
Click to expand...

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
Click to expand...

Those were not contradictory statements, the question is of repeated transgressions.
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
Click to expand...

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
Click to expand...

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
Click to expand...

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
Click to expand...

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
Click to expand...

What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.
 
Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
Click to expand...

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
Click to expand...

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
Click to expand...

What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.
Click to expand...

Agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top