People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
Pressing
So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.
Fucking Doogs are delusional
UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.
Hth
I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.
You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
It's actually an interesting point you bring up.
Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.
Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.
All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH
UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.
"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all