AS AN AMERICAN I DEMAND TO KNOW WHICH ONE IS MORE IMPORTANT TALENT OR COACHING!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
This is a vote for talent right? The coaching was abysmal.
AS AN AMERICAN I DEMAND TO KNOW WHICH ONE IS MORE IMPORTANT TALENT OR COACHING!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
AS AN AMERICAN I DEMAND TO KNOW WHICH ONE IS MORE IMPORTANT TALENT OR COACHING!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
This is a vote for talent right? The coaching was abysmal.
Hitler had a lot of 5* recruits.
Last SERIOUS post from me (since I'm right and I know it...fuck you).
Dennis thinks we can predict outcomes based on simple correlation. He didn't pass my stats class. He's wrong. I'm right, as always. Simple fact.
If we compare football talent to musical selection, the answer is obvious. Styx sucks and was out in the first round. My Zeppelin won the whole fucking thing. Ergo ipso facto dennis is fucking stupid and I am right.
Checkmate bitch.
If we compare football talent to musical selection, the answer is obvious. Styx sucks and was out in the first round. My Zeppelin won the whole fucking thing. Ergo ipso facto dennis is fucking stupid and I am right.
Checkmate bitch.
Styx didn't really belong and normally would have gotten a bid to the Classic Rock NIT. But there were political considerations to consider, so there you have it.
Last SERIOUS post from me (since I'm right and I know it...fuck you).
Dennis thinks we can predict outcomes based on simple correlation. He didn't pass my stats class. He's wrong. I'm right, as always. Simple fact.
![]()
I know this is a hyper complicated model, but it isn't actually describing a correlational model. I can see where you'd get confused.
Just to replace the terms for you:
Independent Variable = Recruiting Success
Moderator = Coaching
Dependent Variable = Winning
Hitler had a lot of 5* recruits.
Hitler had a lot of 5* recruits.
He also had a LOT of 6* recruits. He squandered that talent.
Hitler had a lot of 5* recruits.
He also had a LOT of 6* recruits. He squandered that talent.
If only the state of Washington would get off it's fucking ass and allow UW to do the type of genetic engineering we're going to need to get 6* recruits, we would get somewhere.
FUCK THE GOVT.
Last SERIOUS post from me (since I'm right and I know it...fuck you).
Dennis thinks we can predict outcomes based on simple correlation. He didn't pass my stats class. He's wrong. I'm right, as always. Simple fact.
![]()
I know this is a hyper complicated model, but it isn't actually describing a correlational model. I can see where you'd get confused.
Just to replace the terms for you:
Independent Variable = Recruiting Success
Moderator = Coaching
Dependent Variable = Winning
![]()
