Standing by my original statement She's gross.
I thought she'd be your type. Clearly has daddy issues.
Her tats = her stewardship of the UW brand: No plan. No originality. Just mindless, scattered, sloppy, ugly, failing attempts to keep up with trends... eventually just creating damage to the thing itself.
Her tats = her stewardship of the UW brand: No plan. No originality. Just mindless, scattered, sloppy, ugly, failing attempts to keep up with trends... eventually just creating damage to the thing itself.
This is pretty deep.
POTD
Her tats = her stewardship of the UW brand: No plan. No originality. Just mindless, scattered, sloppy, ugly, failing attempts to keep up with trends[/b]... eventually just creating damage to the thing itself.
Her tats = her stewardship of the UW brand: No plan. No originality. Just mindless, scattered, sloppy, ugly, failing attempts to keep up with trends... eventually just creating damage to the thing itself.
This is pretty deep.
POTD
It reads like a Jordan Peterson quote
Her tats = her stewardship of the UW brand: No plan. No originality. Just mindless, scattered, sloppy, ugly, failing attempts to keep up with trends... eventually just creating damage to the thing itself.
This is pretty deep.
POTD