More Religion of Peace

Aztecs cut out hearts. So it's cool what the muslims are doing

Ozone fucking stupid
 
Is it okay (in a strictly moral sense) if I cut off Ozone's balls because ancient shamans in Northern Europe were ritualistically castrated by their tribes?
 
Last edited:
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.
 
Is it okay (in a strictly moral sense) if I cut off Ozone's balls because ancient shamans in Northern Europe were ritualistically castrated by their tribes?

Are you suggesting you've finally thought of a job that you might have the skills for?

Fondling men's balls?

Are your hands soft and is your mouth pretty?
 
G$10.95AA

I like to blame religion for violence that has existed for all of human history instead of just blaming humans.

Just because you're a pussy doesn't mean you're somehow immune to violence. Step away from the keyboard and take a long walk in a war torn area and get some perspective.
 
Last edited:
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helps
 
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helps

Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?

Fox%27s+Pie+Chart.jpg


I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...
 
People can back more than one candidate, you know.

Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....

Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...

And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
 
Last edited:
People can back more than one candidate, you know.

Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....

Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...

And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.

In their defense, the avg. Fox News viewer is like 86 (not actually that much of an exaggeration)
 
People can back more than one candidate, you know.

Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....

Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...

And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.

It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.

They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.

HTH. OzoneFS.
 
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helps

Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?

Fox%27s+Pie+Chart.jpg


I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...
The problem is you don't appreciate abundance.

honk em
 
People can back more than one candidate, you know.

People can back more than one candidate, you know.

Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....

Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...

And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.

It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.

They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.

HTH. OzoneFS.

ROFL, ask anybody with a job. You don't convey that type of information on a pie chart, you do it on a bar chart. Pie charts are for reporting information where each section is a piece of the 100% whole. If Fox was trying to show what you suggest, they would have used a bar chart.
 
People can back more than one candidate, you know.

People can back more than one candidate, you know.

Sure, but when showing that information, everybody knows you don't show it on a pie chart where everything is supposed to add up to 100%....

Well... everybody with a job knows this anyway. Most of them. Except for the Fox News folks it seems...

And thanks for confirming my second point that most of you won't get the problem diagram.
Lookit Mr. Pie Chart superiority guy here.

It isn't going to add up to 100% if people were allowed to back more than one candidate in the poll. It would add up to 100% if the options were as follows: Mitt, Palin, Huck, or More than one candidate. But putting that on the chart wouldn't give the intended information, which was to show which candidate had a more backers.

They were showing the percentage of people polled that were in support of each candidate, and it's obvious they allowed them to pick more than one candidate.

HTH. OzoneFS.

ROFL, ask anybody with a job. You don't convey that type of information on a pie chart, you do it on a bar chart. Pie charts are for reporting information where each section is a piece of the 100% whole. If Fox was trying to show what you suggest, they would have used a bar chart.
You really don't get it. There are no regulations or laws governing pie chart percentages. I guess they could have adjusted the percentages to add up to 100% (but that wouldn't have been very honest), or put it in a bar graph (which is the approved method of showing data with more than one response choice). If they wanted to be as clear as possible, they could have published the entire statistical study. But obviously they flashed that on screen for a few seconds, so that wasn't really necessary.

What does this have to do with you supporting the murder of women and children anyways?
 
Last edited:
Ozone with the Rush and FAUX newz smack. Laying it down hard. Awesome.

Meanwhile we mocked his response to Muslim slime before he gave it and he thinks we don't get it because libruls are all smart and shit

Ozone you magnificent bastard we read your book. Your the most predictable poster here

*you're

lol
gfy
 
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

No one is missing the point except you.

HTH.
 
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

You say a lot of shit... most of it babbling nonsense that usually just sounds like

QUAAAACK, QUAAACK, QUACK, QUACK, QUACK... QUAAAACK, QUAAACK, QUACK, QUACK, QUACK...
 
God damn you guys are stupid fucktards. Way to continue missing the point. I'm not saying Islam is okay, I'm saying nearly all religions are bad. Islam is just the latest example.

Your point is stupid, not missed. Hope this helps

Stupid? You mean like the news sources that you wingers follow?

Fox%27s+Pie+Chart.jpg


I'm sure most of you won't understand the problem with this diagram...

That at the time this poll was taken, 60%+ of respondents would have been happy with any of the three candidates.

I win... if it's a Seaplane ride, I'll defer to Canard and you two can fly south for the winter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top