Meet the 2013 Tennessee Titans

There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html
Click to expand...

Yea I was going to say that as well. Why I highlighted it hoping someone with a computer would post his actual W-L.
Click to expand...

you guys are correct about Tom Brady, Typo...
1998 - 10-3
1997 - 12-0

88%

 
There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html
Click to expand...

Yea I was going to say that as well. Why I highlighted it hoping someone with a computer would post his actual W-L.
Click to expand...

you guys are correct about Tom Brady, Typo...
1998 - 10-3
1997 - 12-0

88%
Click to expand...

Griese was in 1997 though. Brady era was 1998 and 1999.
 
Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Click to expand...

Ty before Jack- 72-67

Ty with Jack- 4-21

Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham.
Click to expand...

I sense some tongue in cheek, but I disagree. Ty took the UW job to get one more good payday. He basically gave up on coaching after he was fired from Notre Dame. I'm sure he was lazy at Stanford and Notre Dame, but I doubt he put in as little effort there as he did at UW.

 
Anyone who is truly attempting to argue that Jake was an above average quarterback is too dense to argue with.
Click to expand...

I bet every opposing head coach that went up against Jake would rate him above average as a COLLEGE QB.

But once again I will defer to your knowledge because I am sure you have a better handle on the game then most coaches.
Click to expand...

Damn I forgot to put this in my doog myths topic. Whenever a Doog can't argue his point using facts he'll passively aggressively mock you by stating "what do you know? Are you a head coach or GM? Yea that's what I thought".
Click to expand...

Do you follow Nascar? I usually only see this high level drafting at Daga or Daytona? Sure hope some of the top posters don't stop quickly, because your head is going to be inserted in a painful position.

Please, just 1 original thought. If you quit following along like a Zombie and repeating talking points, you just might stumble upon one.
Click to expand...

You've repeated every line from the Doog script. You even resorted to calling out a poster for not being an NFL GM when you couldn't respond to his facts.

Your level of pressing is exactly why banning Harv was stupid.
Click to expand...

Hold the phone. So, when I express my opinion I am "too dense to argue with". Yet when I challenge that person's football knowledge I am using the "Doog handbook".

And I have provided more stats than anyone in this thread.

Nice job with the talking points.

Thanks for proving my point about the original thought. But it's much easier just to call someone a Doog an move on. That is really clever.

Maybe you should quit trying to ride the coattails of others.
Click to expand...

Challenging a person's knowledge because they never coached or GMed is a classic Doog move. Idiots on Doogman have done that for over a decade straight now.

Unless you're a GM of a NFL team, you have no right to justify the stupidity of wasting a top ten pick on Lockner.

You provided a lot of cherrypicked stats that are all neatly summarized in one standard stat that you didn't like. Impressive if I compare you to a typical poster of your ilk, but that's like comparing Sark to Ty.

Jake is a legend because the media and fans wanted him to be, even though the black quarterback before him was just as good as he was and the black quarterback after him is significantly better.

The best part about guilty white Seattle liberals is how racist they actually are.
Click to expand...

Passion? true?
 
I bet a lot of fans are glad this guy isn't a GM. What would he have done with these guys in their first couple of years...

Eli Manning 48% 53% 57% 56%
Peyton 56% 28 INT
Brees 59% 31 INTs 1st 2 full seasons
Flaco 57% in yr 4

The performances by RGIII and RW were very rare, and almost every QB in the history of the NFL would be considered a failure when compared to their rookie season.

Maybe give the guy more than 1 full season before Nostradumbass considers it a complete failure.
Click to expand...

How's Lockner doing for you on Madden 2014?
Click to expand...

I bet you are one of these young Husky fans that talk about how great Sonny was @ QB. Even with those numbers and record, he is a Husky Legend after all.

The hate for Jake cracks me up.
Click to expand...

It's not hate to point out how mediocre Jake Locker was as a college quarterback. The facts and the stats speak for themselves.
Click to expand...

Please take off you Sonny jersey before you post.

He IS a Husky Legend.
Click to expand...

Dude was 15-25 as a starting QB in his Husky career. If that makes him a legend, that means the football program is more fucked than any of us feared.

I noticed you don't bother to reference any of his stats...I can't imagine why.
Click to expand...

My God, does anyone on here know anything about Husky football? Go get a coffee and browse through the Husky record book.

You might see Jake's name once or twice.

So he played for 2 of the worst coaches in Husky history, but the record is put at his doorstep?

Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

Jake's in the record books because he started 40 games. He accumulated numbers by playing a lot, not by playing well.

Here are the career leaders by passer rating for Husky QBs (source, minimum 100 pass attempts):

Price - 138.9 (BENCH HIS BLACK ASS!!!!)
Moon - 134.9
Flick - 133.7
Hobert - 132.4
B. Huard - 131.3
D. Huard - 129.9
Pickett - 125.0
Cowan - 123.3
Stanback - 122.9
Tuiasosopo - 121.7
Locker - 119.0

Thanks for proving once again that Doogs hate stats and facts. The myth that Jake Locker was a legendary Husky is sickening. He was a white Stanback, at best (hi Golve!).
Click to expand...

free pub!
 
Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Click to expand...

He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

Anyways still not great.
 
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Click to expand...

Ty before Jack- 72-67

Ty with Jack- 4-21

Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham.
Click to expand...

Jack was 3-13 with Ty.........So many people posting incorrect stats in this thread my god.
 
Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Click to expand...

He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

Anyways still not great.
Click to expand...

For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.

So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).
 
Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Click to expand...

He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

Anyways still not great.
Click to expand...

For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.

So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).
Click to expand...

Yea he was 12-12 under Sark, I assumed you forgot the Price vs Oregon game so I just subtracted one loss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top