Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

https://newsmax.com/newsfront/twitter-mrna-covid/2022/10/09/id/1091111/

Twitter blocked and then unblocked Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo's post regarding a study indicating that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have caused increased deaths among young men ages 18 to 39.

"This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination," a press release from the Florida Department of Health read. The press release was linked in Ladapo's Twitter post.

"With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19," Florida's Department of Health continued, "the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks."

Lapado's original post was on Friday, but Twitter responded swiftly, deleting it. Below, Twitter appends its reasoning for the censorship, according to Politico.

"Our current misleading information policies cover: synthetic and manipulated media, COVID-19 and civic integrity. If we determine a tweet contains misleading or disputed information per our policies that could lead to harm, we may add a label to the content to provide context and additional information."

On Sunday, Twitter unblocked the tweet.
Click to expand...

On day one of his ownership Musk needs to ask to see the free speech hater who blocked this tweet and fire their ass on the spot. Then have security perp walk then directly out of the building. One floor at a time. Send a message to all of the other little Nazis.
 
Last edited:
"Where is the control group?" screams the get on the train brain-dead.

The control group are the hundreds of millions world-wide who didn't get on your fucking train...you know those people who you want a tyranical government to eliminate because you can't kill a fly. Fuck you hornboy you'll be the first.
https://twitter.com/chrislittlewoo8/status/1577950371502252037?t=6KayK2gjZTexRZQylcgcZQ&s=19
Click to expand...

"Fuck you hornboy you'll be the first."

New board motto

I'm gonna wildly speculate on future outcomes and say that the mass poisoning was a slow roll. Even the globalists aren't that dumb that they'd off the entirety of humankind in one fell swoop. So they only poisoned a portion of the population. They rest who haven't been permanently fucked or suffered side effects received a semi-panacea.

HOWEVER, the annual jabs would have a similar percentage of poison and, over time, they'd depopulate that way. All stealing the masses assets and destroying their lives.

Or some other nefarious plan to eradicate the unwashed.

Which will all come out as the savages refuse to comply and overthrow the authoritarians.
Click to expand...

Look, I only got the JJ jab to keep my job. I’m not into lockdowns or mandates and I’m pretty sure our experimental vaccine was rushed and has some pretty shitty side effects for some folks but making the Covid vaccine your method of extermination seems like an odd choice. Wouldn’t it be easier to put something in the flu shot? It’s already a widely accepted form of vaccination. Why go through the Covid craziness? Why out yourself and your plan to the masses? If you want to go all Dr. Evil then consider that the Covid shot is the antidote. The antidote to the virus that hasn’t been released. Instead of killing off your compliant base you eliminate the “patriots” and dissenters. Now the evil overlords are left with a population that will be more than happy to be led by the nose down whatever path our betters see fit. I’m just a grocer and I’m no grind but doesn’t it seem like a bad idea for the hyper evil, globalist think tanks to let the gun wielding and highly skeptical, pure blood portion of the world be the ones left after all the Covid shots? The shots being the method of extermination just doesn’t sound like a good idea to me. What do I know? Those cans of corn won’t stack themselves. I gotta go.
Click to expand...

View attachment 52495

I won't argue that.

Who knows what's up their sleeves? But something is/was up their sleeves and were it not for the beauty of the internet, all this shit would take decades to uncover.[/b]
Click to expand...

I think it may be even simpler: I think it's about control, period. The future will depend on control and nothing allows it more than a) constant monitoring and compiling data on everyone, and b) conditioning large masses of the population to remain fearful at all times and look only to the Nanny State for protection and elimination of those fears.

Disease, Starvation, Drought, Climate Change!!!

Nothing but the Gov't is big enough and smart enough to fix those problems, right?
 
Minor inconvenience
https://twitter.com/NahasNewman/status/1579858774856462336?s=20&t=v2gnvhBpMyIU6k6EyKuHcA
Click to expand...
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archi...ve-accountability-for-the-covid-shutdowns.php

7p8ag3eb8odj.png
 
Definitely one of the most effective vaccines in the history of vaccines according to the dazzler.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/...ectiveness-turns-negative-within-months-study

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Turns Negative Within Months: Study[/b]

BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, OCT 12, 2022 - 03:30 AM
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The effectiveness of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine against infection turns negative over time, according to a new study that was funded by the vaccine maker.

The effectiveness of three doses—a primary series and a booster—against infection remained above 50 percent after 150 days against BA.1, a subvariant of the Omicron virus variant, researchers estimated.

But against more recent strains, including the currently-dominant BA.5, the effectiveness turned negative.

Against BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5, the effectiveness went negative after 150 days.

Against BA.1.12.1, the effectiveness turned negative after 91 days.

Negative effectiveness means a vaccinated person is more likely to contract COVID-19, the disease the virus causes, than an unvaccinated person.
 
View attachment 6905
Definitely one of the most effective vaccines in the history of vaccines according to the dazzler.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/...ectiveness-turns-negative-within-months-study

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Turns Negative Within Months: Study[/b]

BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, OCT 12, 2022 - 03:30 AM
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The effectiveness of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine against infection turns negative over time, according to a new study that was funded by the vaccine maker.

The effectiveness of three doses—a primary series and a booster—against infection remained above 50 percent after 150 days against BA.1, a subvariant of the Omicron virus variant, researchers estimated.

But against more recent strains, including the currently-dominant BA.5, the effectiveness turned negative.

Against BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5, the effectiveness went negative after 150 days.

Against BA.1.12.1, the effectiveness turned negative after 91 days.

Negative effectiveness means a vaccinated person is more likely to contract COVID-19, the disease the virus causes, than an unvaccinated person.
Click to expand...

 
A guy I know had a minor heart attack last week. When he was at the hospital to have a stent put in, he was with the Dr. prior to sign the waiver on the possible blood transfusions that they may need to use, etc. He told the Dr. that he would not accept blood that had been from a vaccinated person. Dr. got so pissed that he left the room and they had to bring in another one to perform the surgery.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top