Does Cosmo still have sex articles? Those used to be good reads.
Last edited:
Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread
- Thread starter Swaye
- Start date
Does Cosmo still have sex articles? Those used to be good reads.
They come for everyone eventually. Foochie is a hero though
http://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/1377630882182406147?s=19
http://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/1377630882182406147?s=19
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
Quite honestly, Mitch, I've felt Berenson has gone progressively nuttier, shriller and emotional as tim has gone on. ATBS, weº used to value dissenting voices.
Disagree
Berenson caught more than he dropped there for awhile. Lost interest quite honestly
But manufactured consent is rarely truth and the free flow of ideas used to be a good thing
But manufactured consent is rarely truth and the free flow of ideas used to be a good thing
Berenson caught a lot more than Fow Chee, the WAPO and the NY Times did. Just like Abbott and DeSantis did versus Cuomo or Newsome.
The Atlantic > Pravda > Der Sturmer
Pitchfork51
Active poster
One might say....a surge?
RACIST!
UWerentThereMan
New Fish
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/KyleKashuv/status/1377739020315193344
She says the quiet part out loud.
People are going to go out and enjoy these freedoms anyway.....
The horror
TurdBomber
Active poster
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
It's almost as if we've been down this road before.
Do it, or we're taking away all your freedoms, slave.
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
It's almost as if we've been down this road before.
Do it, or we're taking away all your freedoms, slave.
Last edited:
It's really not fair to rank the professionals with the amateurs.