Mask Mandate vacated....
- Thread starter Goduckies
- Start date
What kind of conversation do you want? That this theater has been a hoax from day 1? That you've found religion from your downvoting passive aggressive bullshit of the last 2 years?
Disavow your Ostrich Boy shilling or Fuck off.
Qualifications for judicial appointments are a joke. Elena Kagan never was confirmed for a judicial position and is on the Supreme Court. She should recuse herself from all cases because of that? (really wish she would but that is a different conversation)
In a Fresh Dialogues interview, Jeffrey Toobin, a Supreme Court analyst and Kagan's friend and law school classmate,[88] speculated that she would be Obama's nominee, describing her as "very much an Obama-type person, a moderate Democrat, a consensus builder"[/i] Kagan gets approval from a man who masturbates on Zoom -
They are all political - and dats the truth
In a Fresh Dialogues interview, Jeffrey Toobin, a Supreme Court analyst and Kagan's friend and law school classmate,[88] speculated that she would be Obama's nominee, describing her as "very much an Obama-type person, a moderate Democrat, a consensus builder"[/i] Kagan gets approval from a man who masturbates on Zoom -
They are all political - and dats the truth
MikeDamone
Well-known poster
I’d like a conversation. Let’s have one. What’s the topic? That you’re not a “dem”. That most Dems want or don’t masking on planes? They the judge made a poor ruling because the left says she is “unqualified”. I’m ready.
Last edited:
MikeDamone
Well-known poster
I’m sure not all Dems wanted masks mandates. Just like I’m sure not all Reps didn’t want mask mandates.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...m-to-want-them-polls-suggest/?sh=3ac370287e48
But the Harris poll said 60% of those polled wanted the mask mandate on planes to be extended. I did it see the poll data, but if represented all party affiliations equally, one could reasonably conclude that well over 50% Dems wanted the mandates and well under 50% not Dems wanted mandates.
Is this the conversation you’re looking for?
Last edited:
Thomas isn't political unless reading and enforcing the written Constitution is political. Political is Justice Sotomayor decision on the New Haven, Connecticut case in which she ruled that the exam was discriminatory because too many blacks were failing the test. Apparently asking questions about hose pressure and water volume is racist. The case was overturned by the Supreme Court, with the Supreme Court ruling that denying promotion to white firefighters based on race was right there in the Constitution.
Once again, from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -
(j) Preferential treatment not to be granted on account of existing number or percentage imbalance
Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be interpreted to require any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee subject to this subchapter to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such individual or group on account of an imbalance which may exist with respect to the total number or percentage of persons of any race, color, religion, sex, or national origin employed by any employer[/b]
HHusky
Active poster
“She presents as a delightful person and she has many friends who support her nomination. Her integrity and demeanor are not in question. These attributes however simply do not compensate for the short time she has actually practiced law and her lack of meaningful trial experience.”[/i]
Lefty ABA reasoning
You can't support a single opinion you hold in a "conversation". Hth you fucking muppet.
