creepycoug
Well-known poster
I'm with @ntxduck. I disagree with every single one of Lanning's 4th down calls, but I also liked Chris Petersen, so I guess according to this board that establishes a long history of being a bitch. Poont is, reasonable people can disagree on the intelligence of going for it on 4th down (statistics suggest it's usually the smart move), but NOBODY ON EARTH can defend losing a game because you run a play instead of taking a knee.
It's the difference between winning the annual Fake Tough Guy Award° and being a total fucking retard, regardless of who beat an entirely different Husky team with an entirely different staff and no big Penix.
Let me help you out, because our feathered friends have confused the conversation.
Mario 3, UW 0
Danning 0, UW 2
Nothing Cristo does or does not do at Miami has a single thing to do with that, so bringing it up is, at best, obfuscation. Miami beating GT in even the medium scheme of things was nothing. By being that close, I knew what was going to happen the rest of the season. Yesterday? Different stakes.
Washington was great yesterday, but Oregon's coach stole the V from his players. It's fairly straight forward. Even Danning admitted that he'd like a do-over on the end of half FG. Uh, yeah? No shit. You lost by 3. If you were smart, you'd want a do-over on the other one too.
Don James won a lot of games kicking field goals on 4th down. Ask @RaceBannon .