Lucy Martinez is still teaching in Chicago Public Schools

[HHusky]

So when you said you were for free speech, you meant your own.

So you feel that free speech means being able to say anything without consequences?

Absolutely not.
I've routinely said the opposite.
The consequences have to be legal, however. I'm going to hazard a guess that a Chicago public school teacher is not an at will employee.

 

[HHusky]

So when you said you were for free speech, you meant your own.

Did she get arrested?

Of course not.
This isn't Tennessee.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So when you said you were for free speech, you meant your own.

So you feel that free speech means being able to say anything without consequences?

Absolutely not.
I've routinely said the opposite.
The consequences have to be legal, however. I'm going to hazard a guess that a Chicago public school teacher is not an at will employee.

Yes, just like what was done to Charlie Kirk was legal.

 

[HHusky]

So when you said you were for free speech, you meant your own.

So you feel that free speech means being able to say anything without consequences?

Absolutely not.
I've routinely said the opposite.
The consequences have to be legal, however. I'm going to hazard a guess that a Chicago public school teacher is not an at will employee.

Yes, just like what was done to Charlie Kirk was legal.

You hadn’t noticed it’s being prosecuted?
It was in all the papers.

 

[Sources]

So when you said you were for free speech, you meant your own.

So you feel that free speech means being able to say anything without consequences?

Absolutely not.
I've routinely said the opposite.
The consequences have to be legal, however. I'm going to hazard a guess that a Chicago public school teacher is not an at will employee.

We know you certainly don't hazard in facts

 

[HHusky]

Looks like @Sources wants to wager she's at will.
How much?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Looks like @Sources wants to wager she's at will.
How much?

Can't understand a point or won't?