Luckily we have inflation at only 3.7%

[HHusky]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .

 

[Sources]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .

High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there

 

[RaceBannon]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .

High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there

Vote for Joe and get no growth and high inflation!

It could work

 

[HHusky]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .

High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there

Bubbles are great . . . until they're not.

You gals might want to take a remedial econ course or two.

 

[RaceBannon]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

 

[HHusky]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

 

[RaceBannon]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

 

[HHusky]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

 

[SFGbob]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

And yet he's winning and has won

It's all about winning

Why would I support candidates 50 points behind him?

Trump is the only one leading Biden

You know who doesn't care about winning? Never Trumpers

He is "winning" with GOP primary voters. Just like Bernie would have won with Rat Party primary voters. The DNC actually cares about winning National elections so they torpedoed Bernie, twice. You don't care about winning so you'll vote for Trump. You know how easily a Nikki Haley would beat Biden? But you don't care about winning you care about Trump.

 

[RaceBannon]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

You've already been humiliated on this

Note
Ignore all the inflation the first two years

By all means run on the no growth high inflation platform

 

[RaceBannon]

http://twitter.com/JosephTwohig/status/1709962610609627574?t=3JXURQM6usHWNGIinzj4vQ&s=19
http://twitter.com/Fearless45Trump/status/1707760489625706872?t=VE8lumLu7KgYqeKV4t4HQw&s=19
http://twitter.com/JohnMTillman/status/1708937797417971858?t=zaOp8ID6IAua4cALLo58xA&s=19

Bump

H - the economy is great!

 

[RaceBannon]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

And yet he's winning and has won

It's all about winning

Why would I support candidates 50 points behind him?

Trump is the only one leading Biden

You know who doesn't care about winning? Never Trumpers

He is "winning" with GOP primary voters. Just like Bernie would have won with Rat Party primary voters. The DNC actually cares about winning National elections so they torpedoed Bernie, twice. You don't care about winning so you'll vote for Trump. You know how easily a Nikki Haley would beat Biden? But you don't care about winning you care about Trump.

Trump is leading Biden and is closer to my issues

She may be veep

Trump is crushing her too. It's your party Bob

McCain and Romney were winners too. Allegedly

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Also this:
http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .

High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there

Bubbles are great . . . until they're not.

You gals might want to take a remedial econ course or two.

You've been shown your ass repeatedly.

Take an econ class!?#

Do you actually believe your own shtick?

 

[BleachedAnusDawg]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

Willful idiot. Keep ignoring the massive inflation the two years prior. The damage is already done. We underwent more than a decade of inflation overnight, but now that it's 3.7% all is well?

 

[SFGbob]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

Willful idiot. Keep ignoring the massive inflation the two years prior. The damage is already done. We underwent more than a decade of inflation overnight, but now that it's 3.7% all is well?

Anyone who is shopping for food, fuel or has taken a look at their latest electric and NG bill knows the claim that inflation is at 3.7% is complete lie.

 

[RaceBannon]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

And to answer your question

Yes I was

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

Found another cult

Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

Condolences.

Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

I guess you missed the memo

We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

Bold strategy

3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?

I guess we'll ignore the 7-9 percent for two years and the unnecessary printing of 5 trillion supply chain issues, and 500 ships sitting in LA/Long Bitch Harbor for weeks

 

[HHusky]

Bloomberg Finance column today:

The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”[/i]

HHusky is always right. Just accept it.

 

[Bob_C]

Bloomberg Finance column today:

The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”[/i]

HHusky is always right. Just accept it.

Lol

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Bloomberg Finance column today:

The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”[/i]

HHusky is always right. Just accept it.

With 3.9% inflation. Yet you persist in your stupidity.