Locker, Price or Browning

You guys think way too highly of Price. When things were going well he strutted around waving his finger. When he got hit and we were getting killed by 30(routine) he limped around and had shitty body language.

Beating the Auburn/Bama of the world takes 2 things on O. Mobile qb and a big wideout who can get 50/50 balls. See Manziel, Watson etc. Your qb is going to get pressured so he better have an outlet he can throw it to who can make that 50/50 catch. Ty Jones can hopefully be that guy and looked like it in scrimmage I attended. Locker would keep Auburn off balance with run and can throw deep ball enough to keep them honest. Imagine Locker, Gaskin and Ahmed in backfield with Chico on fly sweeps. [/b] Would make Auburn defend the whole field.

Locker is a doog legend. Price is a HHB version of a doog legend. It's amazing that a giy who never won shit, wasn't a hard worker, and had very little natural talent is so revered by the group of fans who pretend tm have such high expectations. The Cal game in 2011 meant that much to you? Browning is shit. They all suck.

You are what your record shows. Browning has won more games and has the best single season, by far. Those are the facts.
Click to expand...

No way man imagine Browning on those kp teams

Now imagine kp here now

Get it?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

thinking of locker on this team sounds like a formula for 7-6 to me. you jock sniffers for locker are amazing. nobody is saying price is great, but locker sucked.
Click to expand...

Now you're messing with a, a son of a bitch!
Click to expand...

I'm wasted in Nashville bandb can't stop watching this video. Jake fucked people up with his deceptive side to side. Damn I'm glad he didn't go to Oregon because under chip they would have popped off
 
UW might have won the natty with Locker at qb in 2016
Click to expand...

mtnrh1kn8ly8.png
 
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster? UW is 10 times better at every position these last two years except at QB

 
Last edited:
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
 
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Click to expand...

Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
 
Last edited:
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Click to expand...

Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Click to expand...

Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.

He had brass balls and was super fun to watch when he was on. He was mostly a shit QB though. And there's no chance Pete would have ever handed him his offense.
 
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Click to expand...

Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Click to expand...

Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Click to expand...

Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.

 
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Click to expand...

Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Click to expand...

Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Click to expand...

Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
Click to expand...

You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
 
So now we are comparing Lockner to Browning to make him look good

Speaks volumes
 
Mock me all you want. If Locker is healthy and the coaches arent trying to force him into something he is not, look out. Watch those highlights of Locker juking the shit out of dudes and powering forward against Ohio State, USC, etc. and compare that to Browning.

You think Browning does any better against Nebraska with that roster?
[/b]
Click to expand...
There were plenty of good receivers on that team, so yes. Yes I do.

And you haven't paid any attention to the Pete era if you think he's completely remaking his offense for a QB who can't throw accurately or read a defense.
Click to expand...

Listen doog I already qualified my criteria by saying the coaches would need to let Locker be Locker.

The receivers in 2010 were inconsistent at best, the line sucked, the defense really sucked.

You think Locker looks like a helpless kid against Bama and only scores 7 with this roster? I don't.

Locker could actually throw the fucking ball further than 20 yards. He doesnt need to make reads to throw a 70 yard bomb to Ross. It's not like Browning's check downs got us anything besides an embarassing, game ending pick 6
Click to expand...

Locker might have done better against Bama. But he never would have gotten us to that game because he would have lost a couple we should have won.
Click to expand...

Youre severely underestimating how much better the Browning era roster is. Severely.
Click to expand...

You're severely overestimating Locker's ability to not fuck up. Severely.
Click to expand...

Fuck off. Locker never had this much talent surrounding him. A one legged Locker beats ASU and Stanford last year.

Without Locker in the late aughts UW was a fucking 0-12 team, every year.

Im not even a huge Locker fan but he is better than Browning.
 
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
 
6 pages

same thread that gets made every few months or so

maybe we can debate locker's legacy and skillset into eternity

can't wait
 
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
Click to expand...

You're right, of course.

If only @Babushka could have gotten ahold of him!
 
I love REAL Jake, I don't care about you negahs' flags. Tremendous athlete who never had adequate corching, especially in his formative years. Fuck off.
Click to expand...

You're right, of course.

If only @Babushka could have gotten ahold of him!
Click to expand...

Sadly @Babushka would have been a hugely improvement from the QB coaching he got at Ferndale and whatever minor Huard was the GA QB coach for Willingsham.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top