TheHB
Well-known poster
All I'm trying to say is that having a bunch of elite players is only great if the elite players do their job. What makes the USC's and Alabama's successful is that when they are competing for titles, they are getting everybody to buy in to the success of the good of the team.
Has Sark ever done that at Washington?
Do you think he'll do that at SC all of a sudden?
Does Petersen have a track record of this?
Yes, in an ideal world you take the best players you can and have play with the team first concept.
But you don't have to have a ridiculous number of elite talent guys to win at a high level. You need a lot of very good players combined with a handful of elite players.
So you're saying it's the coaching?