Kill me now
- Thread starter BeerThirty
- Start date
rustysavage
New Fish
@Mosster47 A legendary fag.
How's the ol coaching career coming? What level are you at these days?
How's the ol coaching career coming? What level are you at these days?
backthepack
New Fish
Heard he's now coaching at the highest level in a football state!
EsophagealFeces
Well-known poster
This is doogy as fuck. We don’t even know if we have a quarterback, and there’s no spring ball this year. That is not a recipe for any kind of championship outside of the sustainability natty.
How is it dooging to say that with the talent we've acquired over the last 4 years, theres no excuse for not winning the pac 12? That's literally the opposite of dooging. Fuck the "we dont know if we have a qb" narrative. You have 3 4* recruits. Get one of them to play at a high level! Nobody else had spring ball so why should we fold the cards and say, "well theres no hope this year. I guess we might be better next year when we have spring ball and a new freshman qb."
WilburHooksHands
New Fish
I love May in the Truckstop
Did we lose another recruit or something? Or is this just a TBS emo post?
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
1.) We don't know[/i] if we? don't have a quarterback, the odds just play out that way.
2.) The rest of the roster minus quarterback has a very good chance of being the best in the conference.
3.) The biggest roadblock to winning the conference also doesn't have a quarterback.
I don't think Nanners is dooging that much. Last season, the Huskies either needed a linebacker, needed to ditch the wildcat, or needed to manage their WR room better. Any two of the three, and they may have won the conference last[/i] year, even with how badly it went. This coming season (by which I mean 2027), they'll have a top-three OL, top-three WR corps, top-three TE group, running backs, top DL in the conference, top-two OLB group, linebackers, and top DB room. In some of those groups, the difference between top in conference and #3 will be how young guys (highest rated in the conference young guys) work out.
Seems to me you don't need a dynamic quarterback to win this shit conference with the above going for you. Just game-plan/coach in a way that doesn't actively attempt to lose games, don't put too much on an inexperienced quarterback's shoulders, and win with the run game and defense. There are only four quarterbacks returning in the whole conference. Cal and Stanford in the north and USC and ASU in the south. If you ever wanted a year to break in a new quarterback, it's the year that everyone else is as well and you have the best supporting cast in the conference.
It's pretty much how it looked to me last year, too, then 8-5. So maybe I'll just go fuck myself.
2.) The rest of the roster minus quarterback has a very good chance of being the best in the conference.
3.) The biggest roadblock to winning the conference also doesn't have a quarterback.
I don't think Nanners is dooging that much. Last season, the Huskies either needed a linebacker, needed to ditch the wildcat, or needed to manage their WR room better. Any two of the three, and they may have won the conference last[/i] year, even with how badly it went. This coming season (by which I mean 2027), they'll have a top-three OL, top-three WR corps, top-three TE group, running backs, top DL in the conference, top-two OLB group, linebackers, and top DB room. In some of those groups, the difference between top in conference and #3 will be how young guys (highest rated in the conference young guys) work out.
Seems to me you don't need a dynamic quarterback to win this shit conference with the above going for you. Just game-plan/coach in a way that doesn't actively attempt to lose games, don't put too much on an inexperienced quarterback's shoulders, and win with the run game and defense. There are only four quarterbacks returning in the whole conference. Cal and Stanford in the north and USC and ASU in the south. If you ever wanted a year to break in a new quarterback, it's the year that everyone else is as well and you have the best supporting cast in the conference.
It's pretty much how it looked to me last year, too, then 8-5. So maybe I'll just go fuck myself.
Who has vastly better returning talent than us? I dont think we are returning amazing talent, but the rest of the PAC is dreck as well. Cal returns their QB but they lose all their studs on defense and have not recruited well in the last few years. Oregon is in the exact same spot as us QB-wise and has to replace 4/5 of their o line. ASU loses their 2 biggest offensive weapons. USC has Helton. Again, if Jimmy is the guy, He should win with THIS group in THIS conference.
Our DL and DB groups should be at the top of the conference with who we have returning. Otten should be one of the best TEs. Our WR group should be VASTLY upgraded compared to last year. If those things dont happen, then Jimmy is not the right coach. If they do happen, we win the conference.
Last edited:
EsophagealFeces
Well-known poster
We should have won the conference last year based on returning talent. How’d that work out? We’re a shitty mediocre team until proven otherwise. We downgraded our coaching staff drastically. Our defense should be really good, but if our QB and OC suck, were looking at 7-6 all over again. I’d say that’s the most likely scenario, which is going to fuck this bumper crop class right in the brown eye.
PandaOrangeChiknDuck
New Fish
Oregon is also returning almost their entire defense from last year. The biggest loss is Troy Dye, and they are replacing him with 2 of the top 3 linebackers in the 2020 recruiting class.
BeerThirty
New Fish
Yes
No
backthepack
New Fish
Troy’s recruiting for Oregon already.
So there’s that.
So there’s that.
UDubHusky23
New Fish
you talking about his like on twitter? Or is he doing it elsewhere? If we lose troy I will lose it
sonics1993
New Fish
Is he in the Oregon group chat?
UDubHusky23
New Fish
God I hope not