Ketanji Brown Jackson Needs To Be Impeached. This Dangerously Idiotic Dissent Is PROOF |
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
Must Defend Everything
She makes Somalis look intelligent
Her writings are retarded.
She makes Somalis look intelligent
Her writings are retarded.
HHusky
Active poster
We should definitely impose legal sanctions on stupid opinions. Let’s start here at the Tug.
I think the Supreme Court is a bit more serious
I remember when you cried like a girl about our precious norms being destroyed
She's dumb as a rock but you'd chew your arm off before criticizing a Democrat
Cult indeed
I remember when you cried like a girl about our precious norms being destroyed
She's dumb as a rock but you'd chew your arm off before criticizing a Democrat
Cult indeed
Dazzler fully approves of autopen use by unknown staff for appointments because the vegetable he voted for 63 times couldn't chew gum.
HHusky
Active poster
She’s not a great judge. That’s not the point.
Dissenting opinions don’t violate our norms.
I’d expand the court to 13 or 15 to get more retards like this Jackson dunce on SCOTUS.
The norms and institutions demand it! H leads the TugTard Clown Car again as Ernie claps in awe.
She couldn't define what a woman is at her hearing and most of the GOP confirmed her anyway
Calling for impeachment because she is retarded is valid. Nothing to do with the Constitution.
Though perhaps that's a good amendment to consider at the next convention of states. No retards.
HHusky
Active poster
I think she was a mediocre choice and her dissent in this case meanders into territory that she shouldn’t have ventured into. Had she simply said that talk therapy is treatment and the state has always had the power to regulate treatment, at least she would have been on somewhat stable ground.
Setting her opinion aside, she was voting to affirm the 10th Circuit. It’s not as if she was the only judge who had looked at the regulations and concluded it was within Colorado’s lawful powers to enact this, in other words.
The wisdom of the Colorado statute is a different issue. She comes off as a cheerleader for the policy reflected in the statute. I simply couldn’t disagree with her more on that score, though it is irrelevant to the Constitutional arguments.
But I'm the dangerous right winger. Told the retards here I was a Democrat because issues matter to me. And like Trump they have for a long time
Dude come on now. If I say Napoleon Kaufman was UW's greatest running back but you insist it was Bishop Sankey, that's a differing of opinions. If I say Michael Penix was UW's best QB and you insist that Penei Sewell was, then that's a violation of norms and also a fundamental breakdown of credibility
Men can have a baby is not a dissenting opinion. And that's where we are with KBJ.