Kari Lake꞉ ‘We’re BURNING It ALL to the GROUND’!!

Love this thread. Please keep it going.

But, aw geez, I don’t think folks will like how this ends up.
Click to expand...

Based on what evidence? Use big words
Click to expand...
https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-wraps-trial-no-clear-evidence-overturn-election-1769172

”Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek that Lake's lawsuit is so "frivolous on its face," he's surprised Thompson didn't dismiss it entirely.

Rahmani said aside from the fact that Lake didn't present any evidence proving intentional printer interference or evidence that ballot chain of custody was violated, "Mere conclusionary allegations aren't enough.”

“…Although Lake promised to unveil bombshell revelations that proved she won the election, evidence presented in the two-day trial was lackluster and didn't appear to meet the standards set by Thompson.

Hmm, based on….no evidence? But tweets from Flag Eagle Patriot News tell the real story, not Newsweek, I know.
Click to expand...

Butt seriously though, Newsweek isn't a credible neutral source and you know it. In fact it is no more credible than Flag Eagle Patriot News, which you also know. And if you don't, you are either being intentionally obtuse, or you are actually stupid. There is no other choice.

As for me, I have known since jump that Kari had no chance of reversing the election. GOP losses have been baked in all over since mail in/ballot harvesting was "legalized." Still if she presents some evidence (and printer guy/gal seems like evidence of something weird to me) then good on her. The only way election security will ever be taken seriously in this country is if you fight. If you just roll over and accept broken water mains in the middle of the night, printers that miraculously can't count in only one district, and loads of mail in ballots with no folds arriving in the trunk of a car then you just allow the same bullshit to continue with no check. Of course Newsweek and others shit all over this stuff. They are invested in the the other team winning. Pravda for a modern democracy.
 
I don't know if it was mentioned here yet, but a guy testified that they intentionally mismatched the ballot size (the printers were set for 20" and the card stock was 19). So I was about 90% sure there was foul play. Now it's obvious to everyone except Mello and the lamestream press.
 
The mainstream press coverage is to quote the lawyers defending the election

Case was not proven. Details aren't important
 
I don't know if it was mentioned here yet, but a guy testified that they intentionally mismatched the ballot size (the printers were set for 20" and the card stock was 19). So I was about 90% sure there was foul play. Now it's obvious to everyone except Mello and the lamestream press.
Click to expand...

And the printers were switched to the incompatible format on election day. But testimony isn't evidence ask the Dazzler.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top