Kari Lake tweet this morning

[TurdBomber]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

 

[Sledog]

Every single of about 50 lawsuits filed in 2020 failed, except one I heard of, but that was overturned... you can take off the tinfoil hates and tone down your groupthink. That fatass Culp tried to peddle election irregularities. Dumbfuck dropped his complaints when threated to produce evidence or face charges. Bolsonaro, Kari Lake, Trump, all the same... just can't handle losing.

No standing is a lot different than trials.

 

[TurdBomber]

Every single of about 50 lawsuits filed in 2020 failed, except one I heard of, but that was overturned... you can take off the tinfoil hates and tone down your groupthink. That fatass Culp tried to peddle election irregularities. Dumbfuck dropped his complaints when threated to produce evidence or face charges. Bolsonaro, Kari Lake, Trump, all the same... just can't handle losing.

No standing is a lot different than trials.

I wouldn't expect them to understand injunctive relief.

Whoosh of a Lifetime.

 

[AOG]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

 

[TurdBomber]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature[/b]

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

 

[AOG]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature[/b]

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some infohttps://www.brookings.edu/research/...publican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

 

[Kaepsknee]

Cheat me once. Shame on you. Cheat me twice. Shame on me.

 

[Kaepsknee]

Hobbs won Maricopa by 20 points.

Even Cougs cry less on Apple Cup Sunday then the folks on here.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Progs don't care if the voting machines, printers and computers in the largest county in AZ all go tits up on election day. The day most Republican voters vote. Nothing to see here, move along. You fucking losers are so pathetic.

every election has issues. Light printer ink. Get over it.

Funny how the “issues” only seem to break one way.

Right, when the GOP simply does not get enough votes. The Arizona county that won't certify has nothing all to show as proof. They just don't like the outcome. It's not a good precedent

Kind of like lying on a FISA warrant because you don't like the results?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... [/b]and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

[Citation Needed]

Right @MelloDawg

 

[Swaye]

I'm surprised any of you keep arguing with Team Prog over this. They will never change their minds. They WANT no chain of custody. They WANT opportunity for fraud. Just like they are trying to change election laws to lets felons and illegals vote, etc. They have no valid reasons for wanting less verification, thus security, in the system. And because their position is indefensible, I mean who could possibly be against one citizen one verifiable vote, they have forced Jim Crow 2.0 into the lexicon. Same as it's always been. If your position has no basis in fairness, but you can't say that, blame racism. The progs here know that all the legislative efforts to loosen vote security are by design, to ensure Dems get elected. And if you complain about it, you must be a racist.

Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to win in this environment, and then when finally in power do not puss out, stand up to the charges of racism, and fix election laws state by state. See DeSantis, Ron, for ways to do that.

 

[Bob_C]

Hobbs won Maricopa by 20 points.

Even Cougs cry less on Apple Cup Sunday then the folks on here.

More like 4 points, but still.

 

[Sledog]

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

All studies done by the democrats say that. Shocking.

Chain of custody verification and protocalls also thrown out the window. Shocking. Those manufactured votes can't be tracked it seems.

Also massive voting machine failures but only in republican precincts. Strange. Huge delays for repubs to vote if at all. Nothing to see here.

 

[46XiJCAB]

Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.

 

[BennyBeaver]

I'm surprised any of you keep arguing with Team Prog over this. They will never change their minds. They WANT no chain of custody. They WANT opportunity for fraud. Just like they are trying to change election laws to lets felons and illegals vote, etc. They have no valid reasons for wanting less verification, thus security, in the system. And because their position is indefensible, I mean who could possibly be against one citizen one verifiable vote, they have forced Jim Crow 2.0 into the lexicon. Same as it's always been. If your position has no basis in fairness, but you can't say that, blame racism. The progs here know that all the legislative efforts to loosen vote security are by design, to ensure Dems get elected. And if you complain about it, you must be a racist.

Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to win in this environment, and then when finally in power do not puss out, stand up to the charges of racism, and fix election laws state by state. See DeSantis, Ron, for ways to do that.

Known Racist chimes in above.

 

[BennyBeaver]

Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.

Winners win.

Whole lotta Coogs crying about the refs up in this bitch.

 

[46XiJCAB]

Liars lie and cheaters cheat. AKA, Progressives.

Winners win.

Whole lotta Coogs crying about the refs up in this bitch.

Benny self-identifies.

Thanks for coming.

$8 please.

 

[Sledog]

Some know it was crooked but are threatened with arrest...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizo...to-certify-election-under-duress_4892251.html

 

[Bob_C]

Progs don't care if the voting machines, printers and computers in the largest county in AZ all go tits up on election day. The day most Republican voters vote. Nothing to see here, move along. You fucking losers are so pathetic.

every election has issues. Light printer ink. Get over it.

Things ignorant dumbfucks poast on message boards. Just toss it in the box over there, we'll make sure it doesn't get confused with already counted ballots. Oopsie! Issues all across Maricopa county on election day. Just some ink problems. Fuck off.

So you have proof of a double-count?

Why do you suppose your team is suing to stop a hand recount?

Probably because the winning margins don't justify an expensive recount. A recount would only matter if the result was close. It's not. And you can't just suggest there was double counting without some kind of proof.

Probably? So you don't know.

You need proof but there's no reason to look for proof

Got it. Sue to stop a recount because fiscal responsibility

The shit you guys swallow

There's nothing more fiscally responsible than being able to have a process that is easily auditable and required to be fully audited. Can easily keep the costs of audits down by simplifying the entire election process.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Progs don't care if the voting machines, printers and computers in the largest county in AZ all go tits up on election day. The day most Republican voters vote. Nothing to see here, move along. You fucking losers are so pathetic.

every election has issues. Light printer ink. Get over it.

Things ignorant dumbfucks poast on message boards. Just toss it in the box over there, we'll make sure it doesn't get confused with already counted ballots. Oopsie! Issues all across Maricopa county on election day. Just some ink problems. Fuck off.

So you have proof of a double-count?

Why do you suppose your team is suing to stop a hand recount?

Probably because the winning margins don't justify an expensive recount. A recount would only matter if the result was close. It's not. And you can't just suggest there was double counting without some kind of proof.

Probably? So you don't know.

You need proof but there's no reason to look for proof

Got it. Sue to stop a recount because fiscal responsibility

The shit you guys swallow

There's nothing more fiscally responsible than being able to have a process that is easily auditable and required to be fully audited. Can easily keep the costs of audits down by simplifying the entire election process.

Not only fiscally responsible but it ensures an honest election. Unfortunately that violates two core principles of the left.