John Bolton Trump hater on indictment

[Sledog]

https://rumble.com/v2g8ilu-it-must-...at-john-bolton-to-admit-this-about-indic.html

 

[PurpleThrobber]

LaughingBolton.gif

 

[HHusky]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

 

[Sledog]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

 

[HHusky]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

 

[Sledog]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

Yeah not charged.

 

[RaceBannon]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

Like the dossier?

Or Joe not declaring 50k a month in rent received from Hunter?

 

[HHusky]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

Yeah not charged.

"The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme."

sure

 

[Sledog]

Yeah that looks like a penal code section alright!

 

[HHusky]

Yeah that looks like a penal code section alright!

Straight out of yesterday's unsealed filings.

Next dodge?

 

[Sledog]

No dodge the guy with no charges based in reality didn't mention the REAL charges you just uncovered.

 

[Bob_C]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?

 

[Sledog]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?

Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.

 

[Bob_C]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?

Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.

Shhh, it's a trap.

 

[HHusky]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?

Business expense? I wish I'd thought of that before my audit.

 

[HHusky]

No dodge the guy with no charges based in reality didn't mention the REAL charges you just uncovered.

What part of "Straight out of yesterday's unsealed filings." was too complicated for you?

 

[SFGbob]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

For which you'd normally pay a fine and any unpaid taxes. How did I know that the Dazzler would be defending that craptastic indictment.

 

[HHusky]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?

Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.

He must be great in bed.

 

[SFGbob]

No dodge the guy with no charges based in reality didn't mention the REAL charges you just uncovered.

What part of "Straight out of yesterday's unsealed filings." was too complicated for you?

Can you cite for me how this misdemeanor rises to the level of a felony. What's the actual crime Trump has committed here? Cite it for me.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.

Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.

Yeah not charged.

"The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme."

sure

NDA payments for sexual harassment were deductible in 2017. So, what was the scheme?