John Bolton Indicted

It doesn’t mention Hegseth by name. Did you really fail to recognize that his conduct is mentioned?
But more to the point, I heard an awful lot of TugCon bleating about the supposed “unequal application of the laws” on this forum. Hegseth not only isn’t being prosecuted, he still has his fucking job! Suddenly the loudest poasters on this topic have lost their voices.
I don’t give a shit about Bolton. He’s just another Republican who is willing to speak up after the damage is already done as far as I’m concerned. Like Mitch McConnell. The topic is your hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of your brighter colleagues who are steering well clear of this thread for obvious reasons—you know who you are.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
It doesn’t mention Hegseth by name. Did you really fail to recognize that his conduct is mentioned?
But more to the point, I heard an awful lot of TugCon bleating about the supposed “unequal application of the laws” on this forum. Hegseth not only isn’t being prosecuted, he still has his fucking job! Suddenly the loudest poasters on this topic have lost their voices.
I don’t give a shit about Bolton. He’s just another Republican who is willing to speak up after the damage is already done as far as I’m concerned. Like Mitch McConnell. The topic is your hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of your brighter colleagues who are steering well clear of this thread for obvious reasons—you know who you are.
Click to expand...
We know you have no principles so your arguments have no merit. All that matters is power by your own standards comrade, and we have the power. So now what?
 
Bot admits she’s not up to the challenge.
Points for self-awareness though.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
It doesn’t mention Hegseth by name. Did you really fail to recognize that his conduct is mentioned?
But more to the point, I heard an awful lot of TugCon bleating about the supposed “unequal application of the laws” on this forum. Hegseth not only isn’t being prosecuted, he still has his fucking job! Suddenly the loudest poasters on this topic have lost their voices.
I don’t give a shit about Bolton. He’s just another Republican who is willing to speak up after the damage is already done as far as I’m concerned. Like Mitch McConnell. The topic is your hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of your brighter colleagues who are steering well clear of this thread for obvious reasons—you know who you are.
Click to expand...
Obviously you do care about Bolton, you are here in a Bolton thread crying about anything you can to point a finger at everyone else and it's clearly got you triggered
Make your case against Hegseth!
 
I care that Daddy prosecutes his political enemies only. John Bolton might actually be guilty of something though.
Imagine not being aware of Pete Hegseth’s drunken war plan chat. Is this an act or are you entirely out of touch?
 
HHusky said:
I care that Daddy prosecutes his political enemies only. John Bolton might actually be guilty of something though.
Imagine not being aware of Pete Hegseth’s drunken war plan chat. Is this an act or are you entirely out of touch?
Click to expand...
You already called me out directly or indirectly with " unprincipled cowards".
Now you are insulting me without cause when I am openly willing to hear your argument!!
I am calling you out!
Present your case against Hegseth or STFU counselor
Are you Chicken?
 
Dazzler whataboutism is the best whataboutism.
He's guilty. He stole secret stuff and gave it to people. Who did he give it to is my question.
 
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
I care that Daddy prosecutes his political enemies only. John Bolton might actually be guilty of something though.
Imagine not being aware of Pete Hegseth’s drunken war plan chat. Is this an act or are you entirely out of touch?
Click to expand...
You already called me out directly or indirectly with " unprincipled cowards".
Now you are insulting me without cause when I am openly willing to hear your argument!!
I am calling you out!
Present your case against Hegseth or STFU counselor
Are you Chicken?
Click to expand...
“This chat reportedly had information about the timing of airstrikes, and included Hegseth's brother, his wife and about a dozen other people.”

I don’t have subpoena power, madam. It won’t be investigated and it’ll be swept under the rug. Pete loves Daddy. That’s what matters.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
I care that Daddy prosecutes his political enemies only. John Bolton might actually be guilty of something though.
Imagine not being aware of Pete Hegseth’s drunken war plan chat. Is this an act or are you entirely out of touch?
Click to expand...
You already called me out directly or indirectly with " unprincipled cowards".
Now you are insulting me without cause when I am openly willing to hear your argument!!
I am calling you out!
Present your case against Hegseth or STFU counselor
Are you Chicken?
Click to expand...
“This chat reportedly had information about the timing of airstrikes, and included Hegseth's brother, his wife and about a dozen other people.”

I don’t have subpoena power, madam. It won’t be investigated and it’ll be swept under the rug. Pete loves Daddy. That’s what matters.
Click to expand...
#1, you can't follow instructions.
#2 is that your evidence ?
" This chat reportedly had information"
What chat had information?
#3 NO heresay, media reports or articles are allowed as evidence...see #1
 
HHusky said:
Bot admits she’s not up to the challenge.
Points for self-awareness though.
Click to expand...
Mildred can't read example #5,233.
If you can't refute the point reframe their argument to one you can.
Tik tok, the trains are loading.
 
“At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain,” said the White House.
 
I didn’t realize H was going all the way back to the Signal nothingburger.
What a buffoon. “Lawyer” my ass.
 
@HHusky
H, you opened this can of worms using " media report"
Lots of inflammatory adjectives and allegations but they use leading words like inadvertently and likely..
How did that reporter get inadvertently added to the chat?
Were the other individuals authorized to be in the chat ( wife, brother, lawyer) or were they also added inadvertently?

From a Fox interview of Hegseth…(since you opened the can)
If you remember… I said no one is texting war plans. I said that because I'm in the bowels of the Pentagon every single day… what was shared over Signal then [during the first leak] and now was informal, unclassified coordinations for media coordination [and] other things,"
"At the beginning, it was left-wing reporters at The Atlantic who got hold of it and then wanted to create a problem for the president," he continued.

Again you do not follow instructions, start a thread. Don't hijack this one
I'll consider what you present objectively but if you are going to use opposition hit pieces that are missing crucial details and want the reader to fill in the blanks, I will have to consider articles and Hegseths own words that also debunk or cast doubt on what you present.
 
Last edited:
What aboutism is all the Dazzler has left. Now go Slo Joe stealing and storing docs in his garage and house where Hunters Russian and Chinese folks had access. Dont't forget the Chinese owning the college facility Biden stored stuff and had access.

I'll wait.
 
Sledog said:
What aboutism is all the Dazzler has left. Now go Slo Joe stealing and storing docs in his garage and house where Hunters Russian and Chinese folks had access. Dont't forget the Chinese owning the college facility Biden stored stuff and had access.

I'll wait.
Click to expand...
The Special Prosecutor said Slow Joe was too feeble-minded to be indicted. I don’t recall H even once wanting the 25th Amendment invoked during Rip Van Stinkle’s 4 disastrous years.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top