You MAGAtards are challenged, I understand. You tend to conflate things which should be separated and separate what should be combined. For some reason you also seem to disallow one's freedom of changing one's judgements in light of new evidence.
So there is a difference between being an imminent threat and being a threat. Kent is just saying Iran isn't an imminent threat. This is a distinction (a separation) made in critical thinking. You have to develop some knack of getting beyond simple MAGA explanations for everything though. That's why in general I don't try to appeal to reasoning here.
