As Cougly as Moore is, he's about the only person in the Seattle media who'll call out Sark for being mediocre.
As Cougly as Moore is, he's about the only person in the Seattle media who'll call out Sark for being mediocre.
That's only because he's a Coog though. At least he will question his own coaches unlike Furness who was defending Wulff going into year four despite being 5-32.
As Cougly as Moore is, he's about the only person in the Seattle media who'll call out Sark for being mediocre.
That's only because he's a Coog though. At least he will question his own coaches unlike Furness who was defending Wulff going into year four despite being 5-32.
Wulff just needed three more years. No one would give him time though!
Wulff inherited a program at ground zero (unlike Sark) and was finally making some strides in his last year.
That 2011 WSU team was 4-8 with a 3 point loss to UCLA and OT loss to Utah. Both games they blew in the 4th quarter. Its too bad if they had beat Utah they'd have been 5-6 going into the apple cup. They also played Oregon tough that year. They had made some real strides that year and with major qb injuries. If Tuel is healthy the entire year they probably squeak into a bowl. Wulff got dealt a shitty hand. That team was going to be awful for 2 years even if Saban was the coach. All being said, they had a chance to get Leach and it was obviously the right move.