Jermaine Kearse reveals he won't be back with Seahawks

"Kearse is likely to expensive for the team to re-sign."

What's wrong with that sentence? Way to go King 5. That's why I get my news from KOMO 4, buttfuckers.
 
My comments from January 22nd ...

Regarding Jermaine, I don't have an expectation that he really wants to leave. If the deals are close at all, he's staying. I don't see any reason for the Hawks to not bump him up to a reasonable market level deal with the deal that Baldwin signing as a high end mark and the 3 years for $9-$10M being probably the reasonable range that he is looking for unless someone is really interested in breaking the bank. As Lockett eventually settles into the #2 WR role for this team, Kearse is well positioned to be the #3 WR for this team going forward.

Looks like I slightly undersold the deal range though with the cap that went out and the in general monopoly money that is getting thrown around ... but factoring that in and the comments regarding Jermaine fit like a glove.
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/27461/12s-give-jermaine-something-to-think-about
 
Pulled a Grinolds on this one.
Click to expand...

Look, things change quickly in the NFL free agent landscape. When @DerekJohnson reported this Kearse wasn't signing, so technically we* were right. You need to learn the difference.
If you can't handle the ups and downs of free agency, maybe you need to step away from the keyboard. Take a walk and get some perspective. ;)
 
Pulled a Grinolds on this one.
Click to expand...

200.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top