That's all we have to look forward to. We have to cross our fingers that he's actually an excellent QB and can lead this team for 2-3 years.
FYFMFE
FYFMFE
Jake the Savior, Part II
- Thread starter PurpleBaze
- Start date
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
CAN'T WAIT to hate him in 2016.
HuskyHalfBrain
Active poster
More like 2017.
The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
Youth an rebuilding for 15 years... awesome!
HuskyHalfBrain
Active poster
Exactly.
If not, we are overpaying Peterman.
I hope it's the former.
HuskyHalfBrain
Active poster
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Was he a true freshman?
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.
The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
Last edited:
H_D
New Fish
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.
The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
HuskyHalfBrain
Active poster
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Was he a true freshman?
I don't know. Stop trying to use facts to ruin my argument.
You gave me a hope for a minute there.
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.
The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
Me too, but serviceable won't get us contending when you look at the rest of the roster.
Last edited:
H_D
New Fish
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Was he a true freshman?
I don't know. Stop trying to use facts to ruin my argument.
You gave me a hope for a minute there.
Besides, coming in early and participating in spring practice is just as good as redshirting.
#DoogLogic
H_D
New Fish
81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.
The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
Me too, but serviceable won't get us contending when you look at the rest of the roster.
It will in all hypothetical January upcoming season debates.
But yeah, seriously, you're right.
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
After this game, I might give up my left nut for 6-3 in conference.
whatshouldicareabout
Active poster
I'll wager $20 Sven bucks that we'll get better after losing 4 of these OL.